Hey, antithesis, that's an anti-intelligent comment you just made there. Let me help you out here... I used Mueller, to reference the time frame and general attitude of the very biased media, telling me over and over that they had proof to support the fact that Trump had colluded with Russia. I could attack Mueller, but I didn't this time.
The problem, as I was trying to point out, is that we're bombarded by "news" stories presenting "facts" when all they actually say is, "according to reports..." or, "reportedly Donald Trump peed in his adult diaper today, blah blah blah" and the idiots on the left soak it up like a sponge. And then, when it comes time to present all this proof, they've got nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Seriously, someone had just used that logic, trying to prove me wrong about something. While I am wrong more than I'd like to admit, when someone tells me that Trump is a racist because he has not proven that he's not a racist... well, that's when I feel like I'm taking the crazy pills.
Besides, she's a politician (getting back to the original point now...) so if she thought the word "progressive" would get her one more vote, or one more dollar in campaign money, she'd be the progressive poster child. Besides, when did we start judging people by what they actually do?