Obama Shhh

Did anyone see the news in Germany where three boys took their justice in hand. And begun to stone. Two transgendered men?

Yeah, i saw that. And since this happened in a western country it made the news. People (speaking about liberals) don't realize this is an everyday part of life in Muslim culture and if they wish to accept Muslim culture into our own, this comes with it.

Not exactly. If an american tries to live in russia and use american laws there its goingvto be bad time for the american. Each country has its own law which has to be followed. If you see whatvi mean.

I see what you mean there. But it's not stopping them from trying to setup sharia courts everywhere they go.

I know what you mean

The boys were syrian refugees

Not sure how this comment is connected to his meme (he didn't say anything about hating gays), but upvote anyway - it's a great point.

I'd trade points to get upvotes for that meme bro! (I see you picked up a troll too... I'm familiar with that one. I DV'd for ya. If we can all do that when we spot them we can get their comments put in oblivion)

A disscussion. Gay people and marriage does a few "good" things. It helps curb population growth. It makes a weaker nation easier to control. And probably more. Cons: a weaker nation is easier to defeat. A "sinning" nation is looked down upon. And even more.

Lol I didnt understand any of that. How do gay people make a country "weaker"?

Wimpier

Sure it doesnt.

You never answered me about your kia.

You never answered how it makes a country "wimpier". Have you met gay people? They come in all shapes and sizes, masculine and feminine, muscular and thin, old and young. There is no cookie cutter outline for a gay person, and most gay people are straight acting that you wouldnt even know they were gay. This just screams ignorance.

Lol not a troll. Just asking simple, relatable questions to the topic at hand. How does that make me a troll? Im not making stupid comments, or pretending anything, or any characteristic of a troll. Just because my question and points invalidate your comments, and because you cant answer the simplest of questions, doesnt mean I am a troll lol

This site is about making funny memes. If you have an opinion. Go ahead and post it. Do not try to engage me in what you think might be my "real" opinion. I play all sides of the coin. Just ask my husband mr trump.

One way I've seen: gays serving openly in the military (speaking primarily to combat arms) is a detriment to morale and comraderie. This leads to an overall less effective fighting force. It's bad for a country and gets people killed.

Thats odd. A complete review by all military branches concluded that gays serving in the military show no detriment to anything. Gays have been serving in the military all along, and there is NO evidence to prove what you are saying for the military overall. Its just fear and ignorance. Here are 3 FACTS that completely disprove what you say.
1) The Secretary of the Army is openly gay. (Yeah man those gays can sure cause detriment to morale and camaraderie, given that he has the highest approval rating among his peers as any secretary of the armed forces since world war II LOL)
2) Under the terms of the repeal of "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs certified that repeal would not harm military readiness, followed by a 60 days waiting period. (which they did certify).
3) Here is a study done by the non partisan, non political, military think-tank PALM Center. It is regarded as a reputable source for military studies. It too, backs up the military findings that " the new policy of open service has had no overall negative impact on military readiness, unit cohesion, recruitment, retention or morale". The study includes professors at the U.S. Military Academy, U.S. Naval Academy, U.S. Air Force Academy, and U.S. Marine Corps War College.
So please, dont demean those men and women who are LGBT and fight for our country with honor.
http://www.palmcenter.org/press/dadt/releases/first_study_openly_gay_military_service_finds_nonevent_oneyear_mark

One question: Do you actually serve in the military, in combat arms, and are in the actual group that is affected by this issue?

That question is irrelevant to the topic on hand. Maybe I have, maybe I havent. It makes no difference at the fact that your generalizing of an issue either based on your personal opinion OR your own personal experience is completely incorrect for the armed forces as a whole.

First, are you are asking me to take the opinion of a study from a biased source (I researched the "PALM Center", and it is anything but non-political/non-biased), with biased information (yes, I took the time to go through the information and sources) and take that as fact OVER my own experiences? And I should take this from a person who has never signed a blank check payable of their life to the service of their country?

Second, I am not talking about the armed forces as a whole. I never did. Which shows me that you never even understood my original statement.

Third, with that out of the way, let me go over this "study":

1. My original statement was primarily to combat arms. Their interviewed set of service members represents only ~0.0027% of US armed forces personnel. The number of combat arms personnel represented is ~0.0000009% of US armed forces. They are generalizing based on a very very small number of personnel.

2. Combat arms, which I am speaking primarily of, is the single most affected set of service members. All other parts of the military have little to no effect by gay service members.

3. The study several times mentions that most of the push back against the DADT repeal came from those serving in combat arms. They still chose not to focus their study where the majority of push back came from. An honest researcher would have focused on the area of concern.

4. While they 'can find no evidence' of a formal or informal 'gag order' preventing personnel from publicly expressing negative views regarding the DADT repeal, it does in fact exist. I see it happen and I have had to deal with it myself, not just on the DADT issue, but on racial and gender issues as well.

5. Once again, you did not take the time to understand my statement. I personally know several gay combat arms service members, and I have no problems with them because they keep it to themselves and conduct themselves as expected of them. As I stated, I only have a problem when they are open about it and act gay or try to use it to gain special privileges.

6. In the future, if you wish to be a credible side of an argument, first gain credible first hand experience in the subject matter.

In conclusion, if you are a member of combat arms and have different experiences than myself, my brethren, and all others in my profession whom I have spoken to about this privately; then and only then will I be willing to entertain your thoughts.

Soooo... No one can change their minds? Goes to show how far we are when it comes to learning and being open minded HAHAHAHA

Pandering inconsistency isn't a positive trait. It had nothing to do with being "open minded" (and you know it). It had everything to do with political pressure from within the party. Had it been a Republican, he would've been roasted by the media AND the Democrats for that pandering inconsistency.

I disagree, Ive seen many politicans on both sides grow up on issues (being from a state that has had several switch parties). It doesnt have to be pandering... I mean if you are trying to tell me the LGBT lobby is bigger and has more pressure than the Christian lobby then I would have to laugh and say seriously?! (and you know it)