Comparing unavoidable deaths with murder in a gun debate is dumb.

Calling most of those causes of death unavoidable is utterly stupid!

I didnt, but you can't compare heart & circulatory problems with murder and not see the glaring difference between the two. Heart attacks are not a legal issue. You're also comparing fear. It is clear gun owners have the fear of murder. Your attempt fails on many levels.

They are compared in a perspective of causes of death in the U.S. , so your argument is again...alll wet. I have no more time to spend with someone who just can't admit he is a flaming liberal screaming for more laws to inhibit the right of the people when there is NO BASES for those laws to be implemented. No one is even reading this Meme any more. I am going to support another one :)

*basis
The graph is valid on its own. It is your projection of comparison and fear that fails because a big gun ownership reason is for 'protection'. Also, that is a massive projection onto me about screaming for blah blah. Quote anything I have said to show I am screaming for laws to inhibit rights of the people. I just shoot holes in your logic. But either way, glad you're moving on. I don't mind being labeled a liberal because they are more intelligent. But if you don't feel confident having a debate without an unintelligent gang behind you, then don't talk at all. It might make you seem smarter!

blah blah blah blah blah lol you don't have a job, do you? :D Going to get more work done now to pay all those taxes you liberals live on. Your antagonistic antics fool no one. Toodles :)

I am a psychologist