The Horror!!

you do realise harrasment will get you banned.

Now THAT was funny!

People still wouldn't think for themselves.

captain obvious strikes again

That's why Facebook, Twitter, Google+, etc are called "social media".

Then the media must have over 5 billion or 6 billion parts.

me·di·a1
?m?d??/Submit
noun
1.
plural form of medium.
2.
the main means of mass communication (especially television, radio, newspapers, and the Internet) regarded collectively.

Most social media users aren't using politics to stack their pockets with money and pulling strings on world affairs.

Nothing pulls more strings on world affairs than money. The media is merely a tool for spreading the word on certain agendas.

There's no doubt about that. While I don't necessarily buy into what some conspiracy theorists throw out there, I do acknowledge that there are usually more sinister or selfish explanations for government action than what we are led to believe.

I go with my instincts. We are bombarded with info 24/7. This idea of a "liberal" media verses a singular "Fox" news is just divisive BS. Every media outlet has become more opinion based instead if fact based. If someone says "thunderstorms today, stay safe" thats news. If someone says "terrible thunderstorms today, no else is telling you about them but us" that's not really news.

Honestly, the first thing I do when a major media story breaks is to check sources on both the left and right sides (very few neutral media outlets exist). You'll get parts that the other side will leave out and be able to come to your own conclusion instead of just being given that conclusion.

i think for the internet as i know it,,,,,, it would be hell.

how would we know what the Kardashians were up to ?

Where would you get your news from? Word if mouth? Yeah ...what could go wrong?