El Hombre

That means there is no morality
Just options, opinions that clash each other
You can't justifiably be mad at anybody

True and raw morality comes from our minds, what we perceive as right and wrong. The only reason why we have certain opinions is because we are social creatures, biologically built for tribes and community. Societies can adopt shared morals across multiple collectives into a common idea(s).

Just because we have varying degrees of morality does not mean "there isn't morality at all," our shared ideas still exist but its roots stand as small individual traces of thought.

So to our personal moral structures, yes we 'can' in fact be justifiably mad at anybody.

Biologically built by Who 😏

The f**k

Just trying to get you back into our discussion

Where are we even leaving off lmao

bout here: Bet you 100% that not a single thought went through your comment right there

I'm not doubting God's existence but rather your ability to think deep and be engaging

Besides, God gave us free will, so wouldn't that mean we were built to naturally think and interpret freely? If we were built in His image, why are there three abrahamic religions that believe they're the right one?

Because that's not what "his image" means
Beibg made in God's image means that we're KIND of like God- as in we're able to think deeply, contemplate higher things and fully acknowledge Him
We're eternal beings too, considering we can have eternal life

If we're made to think deeply and contemplate higher order, that gives more reason as to thinking independently where morals can form and alter between people.

How does thinking lead to that

Bet you 100% that not a single thought went through your comment right there

I'm not doubting God's existence but rather your ability to think deep and be engaging

Besides, God gave us free will, so wouldn't that mean we were built to naturally think and interpret freely? If we were built in His image, why are there three abrahamic religions that believe they're the right one?

So would you mind if I threw a party at your house and took all your stuff after?

Nah of course not, right? And if you complained and I did it anyway, who cares, cause its all subjective.

Alright, in this instance:
- My morals tell me it'd be wrong
- Your morals tell you that it'd be right/acceptable

The only reason people have "objective morals" is because we are within a collective with common morals but society has much more nuance than simple universal values, does it not?

What tells you it's immoral to harm or end life? What tells you to care about other people in harm's way?

Well.. hypothetically speaking, suppose I was a room temperature IQ subhuman near-neanderthal, who unwittingly trespassed into someone's home, and then because they were confused and angry at my presence, I got scared and instead of leaving I just couldn't help but escalate the situation and kill them.

Now we all "know" that harming others and killing is wrong, but isn't self defense okay? And if an innocent guy ends up dying because I felt a little stressed and scared, but like, I -really- didn't mean it, that's still understandable?

You see.. if the person in this hypothetical situation was sincere and genuine about all this, sure it's easy to empathize with that and throw all rationality out the window. But the problem is we as a society do have laws to sort out these situations, and to figure out who's really in the right and wrong.

Just because laws and society can uphold moral ideals does not mean it is universally agreed upon. If morality cannot be agreed upon, it cannot be universal.

Gang what is it with you and twitter