1.There was no imminent threat to Karmelo Anthony.
2. Karmelo Anthony’s actions could be considered provocation.
3. Karmelo Anthony’s response was not proportionate to the actions of an unarmed person.
4. Carmelo Anthony committed a crime by taking a weapon to a prohibited place. By committing this crime, he has negated any self-defense claim.
Ignorance of the law is no self-defense. Ignorance of the law can get you in trouble.
I don’t expect you to take my word for it. I demand you do your own research into Texas law.