Meanwhile, in London...

We've been there for years.

Unfortunately Calvinism and the prosperity gospel have won in the protestant sphere and Catholics engage in human worship, so the vast majority of Christians believe all of this is inevitable and that no Satanist would ever dare try and trick them into falsely believing we're already in the final stages of revelation, instead of actively opposing the sham.

Besides. It's far easier to just kick your legs up and think you've already got yours instead of trying to help others regardless how religious you are or aren't.

Either the first world collapses or the entire world enters an endless technocratic surveillance state.

There's no alternative at this point, and Christians are largely to blame for failing to adhere to their own faith.

I'm Atheist but reach the same conclusions, though ofc without the religious lingo. All though I don't know about a third world collapse.
Building it through Trumps new/old economic agenda, which only demands stability for growth and Nation's freedom to live off its own recourses, instead of the UK/EU's current conditional degrading Net Zero system, hopefully creates some progress. Every unstable country wants to get rich without continued trouble, and if that can happen simply by becoming worth investing in, there's a light there

I think you misread what I said. Either that or I'm misunderstanding you.

I said first world collapse because even the GOP is pushing for internet ID legislation that would lay the groundwork for the global technocratic surveillance state outcome.

It would be great if Trump could infact save us from ourselves, but it's increasingly looking like he's a false messiah in that regard, when even his own party is furthering the globalist agenda.

That's why I say a first world collapse is the only viable alternative. I just don't see there being any other plausible outcome of current events.

Ahh the FIRST world. Well, that's happening atm. with the costly effects of the oil 'explosion' and suppression of Net Zero and Green New Deal. European Nations are currently changing energy sources to other than the EU mandated ones. The UK, which means the EU, has its entire machinery out, which means regular industry-conservatives and their investments are in trouble. The ones called Rhinos.
They are conservatives on a National level but globalist go-with-the-flow henchmen on International politics. Globalist collapse is what everyone's complaining about right now, and if countries want to survive (which is up to them) they'll have to eventually let go of the EU teet, and invest strongly in the current resurrection of the old American economic model, which focusses on Nations' own interests and resource development.

Agreed.

The problem with that, however, is that globalism still succeeds.

As I mentioned before, even the Republican party is pushing forward the WEF agenda and Trump is doing nothing to stop it. Whether it's due to complicity or inability, he's not preventing it.

Yeah I don't know about that specific thing there, but when Trump chooses to be silent for days, it's usually cos he's working alternative pressure points. In this case that could be going after the economic interests of the Republicans in question - not by doing the EU thing and give you penalties, but more in the world of changing your economic reasons for choosing one thing instead of another.
He has surprised me with his statements many times and thought "WTF?"... until I later watched how his target reacted after complaining. Like "I'm gonna scatter the Palestinians in their surrounding countries and make Trump Land with real estate". I was like "WHAT? The most anti MAGA thing you can do. And stupid too - the middle east hates Palestinians so how do you think that's gonna happen?"... two weeks later the entire mid east came to the table to discuss the Palestinian situation, and his Board Of Peace was created.
I kept on being fooled about issues a couple of times after that, but eventually I have reason for confidence

Globalists can't succeed when every aspect of Iran is down in terms of endgame. Israel and the Arab Nations have wanted complete destruction of Iran from the start, and Israel wants active regime change calling for the pre 79 crown prince to take over, and he's made his wishes public since late last year.
To Trump though, regime change is a plus, and not a goal (as long as the new isn't the Ayatollah Part 2 ofc) just like Venezuela, and he wants Iran economically intact for prospects reasons. How intact is my only question. Trump is the moderate force in this most important of all wars. Even in during the Irag war, tRump said that he didn't understand why they chose Irag and Afghanistan instead of Iran. At that time I agreed only bc of the declarations that had been made about Iran being the main sponsor of terrorism though only their proxies were attacked. At this time, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Lebanon hit hard on terror orgs in their countries - they may disagree with Israel sometimes, but that's personal issues.
The momentum is there, cos the U.S is hitting Iran's outgoing monetary means in that direction (called Operation Economic Fury) I learned a week later.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNbJMeDL6k4

A month back I think...

Side quest cos I'm drunk...
I'm not that oil oriented - it's filthy. I'd prefer hydrogen and nuclear. But what ever destroys the prospect of the most insane concept - The EU pressure which actively created wokeness and mass immigration - the destruction of my precious Liberalism in the first place. I've watched every step back to my old Communism and even see Trotskyism and Maoism collide. I was a Trotskyist 25 years ago and I understand their pragmatism completely. Leninism and Stalinism were non pragmatic and that's why I wasn't a Leninist. Stalinism is just pure brutality and very rare