this is still so funny

A "right to food" inherently forces others to work to produce, transport, and supply that food. This is most definitely a form of involuntary servitude, violating the rights of those who produce the food, and recognizing food as a legally binding right could infringe on national sovereignty, leading to unintended policy consequences.

Also, There is no universal definition of what constitutes an "adequate" diet, making it legally difficult to define what constitutes a violation of the right to food.

How would a "right to food" would be enforced, especially in areas with severe scarcity? If the food does not exist or cannot be bought, a legal right cannot make it appear.

What next, a "right to oral sex" ?

A "right to food" is in essence communism. Communism theoretically promises (pipe dreams) to meet all needs, historical implementations have always led to severe food shortages, famine and death (e.g., in the USSR or China).

a right to food just means everyone should be able to eat bro
not communism
literally the entire world is against you on this

The United States maintains that while it aims for a world where everyone has access to food, it does not recognize an enforceable legal obligation to feed the world.

Food security is the responsibility of individual nations for their own citizens and that no "extraterritorial obligation" exists under international law.

voting aginst the right to be able to eat is barbaric.
if countries from all ideologies, from dictatorships in russia, communism in china, democracy in basically all of europe, from conservatives in the middle east to liberals in scandinavia ALL agree on something, that means it is a fundamental human thing required. the USA was saying that food shouldnt be a thing all humans deserve.
plus, if the democrats were in power when this vote went down, i bet you would be insulting them for it.

The United States remains the world's largest bilateral donor of humanitarian food assistance, regularly contributing billions annually to combat global hunger. Through agencies like the UN World Food Programme (WFP), the U.S. provides over 50% of food aid in many years, addressing crises in regions like Ethiopia.

good job usa
doing something right for once
aight i unblocked you for this convo because your posts are political and boring
im gonna block you again
so cya until next time i want to argue with you <3

Also, the Democrats were power many times in the past when the UN voted to make food a right:

2021 Vote (Biden Administration): In November 2021, the U.S. and Israel were the only two countries to vote against a UN committee draft that recognized the right to food. The U.S. argued the resolution contained "unbalanced, inaccurate, and unwise provisions," noting that the U.S. does not treat the right to food as an enforceable legal obligation, but rather a goal.
Long-standing Position:

The U.S. has historically voted against or abstained from similar resolutions, including in 2003, 2004, 2008, 2019, and 2020, often citing objections to specific language or the interpretation of the right to food.

coolio
you arent changing my political stance tho lil bro

Wow

Dang, you gotta do some crazy shit to get the Balkans to all agree on something

i think its clear who shouldnt be allowed to vote here