I mean... it's a fair question
given how many times he's
vomited out word-salad
idiocy only to have y'all
defend it like it's the
last scrap of food on
the planet.
Okay... let's look at what
he's shoveling this time:; “If I didn’t terminate Obama’s
horrendous Iran Nuclear Deal
(JCPOA), Iran would have had a
Nuclear Weapon three years ago.”; Yeah... that. Naturally, he's
pushing the "Obama" button
right off the bat because
y'all have demonstrated
it's an "off" switch for
your higher reasoning
centers. So let's eliminate
that from the equation
and just stick with "JCPOA"; Under the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action, Iran's nuclear
program *was* subject to
monitoring, routine and
surprise inspections.
Mhmm... -Orange Foolius'
solution to the Iran nuclear problem was to
tear up the agreement allowing IAEA access
to & supervision of Iran's nuclear program. Genius move, innit?
What better way to ensure
a theocratic regime with
atomic aspirations doesn't
become a nuclear power
than to trade being able
to keep a pervasive eye
on what it's doing for no
supervision at all, right? And that brings us back to the
question of whether y'all are
as stupid as Dear Leader
thinks sooo... preamble out
of the way, your boy is
pushing a "zero super-
vision of Iran's efforts
toward nuclear capability
magically hindered it from advancing
toward developing a nuke" narrative. You're not going to fall for
that crap, are you?
I mean... y'all make a lot
of noise about "common
sense," this is a common
sense issue and anyone with
kids knows they get in the worst kinds
of trouble when no-one's watching.
