void lazy

US Code § 2261A - Stalking
Whoever
(1)travels in interstate or foreign commerce or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel or presence engages in conduct that—
(A)places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to—
(i)that person;
(ii)an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person;
(iii)a spouse or intimate partner of that person; or
(iv)the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person; or
(B)causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or

THE IMPORTANT SECTION, CAPS ARE MY EMPHASIS
(2)with the intent to kill, injure, HARASS, INTIMIDATE, or place UNDER SURVEILLANCE with intent to kill, injure, HARASS, or INTIMIDATE another person, uses the mail, any INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE or ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION SERVICE or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of conduct that—
(A)places that person in reasonable fear of the death of or serious bodily injury to a person, a pet, a service animal, an emotional support animal, or a horse described in clause (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) of paragraph (1)(A); or
(B)causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause SUBSTANTIAL EMOTIONAL DISTRESS to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (1)(A),
shall be punished as provided in section 2261(b) or section 2261B, as the case may be.

okay so good to know that what theyre doing doesnt legally qualify as harassment and that you continuing to say it could be considered libel

Imgflip is an electronic communication service.
Him Bo's behavior "causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause SUBSTANTIAL EMOTIONAL DISTRESS to a person"

it shouldnt cause emotional distress that hes going through public information on a public website. if she doesnt want it there, dont post it. its that easy.

What you are saying is dangerously close to "Your honor if the defendant didn't want to be raped then why was she wearing a short skirt"

no the f**k it does not

not remotely similar in any conceivable way

This my lawyer bruh im going to jail

12 Year Old Harvard Law School Prodigy

u just proved urself false trying to prove urself right 😭

"with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person"
and which of these is him bo doing?

Harass and intimidate, plus emotional distress

he didn't do either of these

Then please share your definitions of those terms with the jury

screenshotting evidence of a user doing something doesn't count as harassment or intimidation

technically harassing and intimidating

he didn't do either of these

Pretty sure impersonating is a crime too

Remind me who toady impersonated again

Ok sure Masq Vama Him bo Probably others

it's already been uncovered garfieldfan8495 was anonymouse

Yapping

When????

How can we take his word for it when he’s acted suspicious before and doesn’t actually seem to be “rosewater” based on his conversation with mewo

Bro thinks he's tuff

Lol nobody is agreeing with you this is sad

Yes exactly With you Nobody laughing with you

truth nuke

real