Here's something juvenile judges should consider

They infact shouldn't, if you watched the movie Greenmile, you would understand why the electric chair shouldn't be used on anyone, much less children

You care more about whether punishments are "cruel and unusual" than about whether or not they make the world a better place.

My response is this. A lot of people either don't understand this or don't want to hear this, but sometimes cruel and unusual punishments are the only punishments that bring people to their senses.

Some people call the atomic bombs we dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II "cruel and unusual punishment". Here's what they should care about: They worked. They got the job done. The Japanese were scared out of their minds, so they surrendered and they never messed with us again.

People don't mess with you when they're scared of you. If someone's scared of you, they'll either treat you with respect or they'll stay out of your way. The biggest and worst troublemakers aren't afraid of anything and sincerely believe they can get away with anything.

If one or more of your loved ones got murdered, you'd want to see the murderers die. Trust me.

How many of your loved ones have been Murdered, do you know from experience or something. Also I do think that murderers should be given a death sentence(depending on the circumstance) however, frying their brain to mush is a f**king horrible way to do it. Also thinking Hiroshima was a good thing is possibly one of the shittiest things ive ever seen, definitely up there.

No, nobody I know has been murdered, thankfully. But I'm sure if someone I care about was murdered that I would hate the murderer. If anyone who knows a murder victim tells you that they do not feel any anger towards the murderer, that someone is either lying or they didn't really care about the person who got murdered.

If you're against executions by electric chair but you're still okay with the death penalty as a whole, how you would execute someone on death row? My concern is that we're too concerned about making executions "humane" so we're working to make executions painless and destroying any deterrent value the death penalty has.

As bad as the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were, the alternative would have been much worse. Without the atomic bomb, the United States would have had to perform an all-out, full-scale, D-day style invasion of Japan with ground troops. And that would have cost at least two million lives on both sides, assuming it worked.

Nobody likes murderers in general dumbf**k. Why are you still arguing for liquefying people's brains?

I now concede that electric chairs are a bad way to execute people, because they take too long and they set people's bodies on fire, endangering people in the room besides the person being executed, especially if the electric current makes muscles twitch hard enough that the restraints break.

I've decided the best way to execute people is by firing squad. Firing squads have the lowest botch rate, and the process of dying is as fast as it could possibly be. The only way a firing squad execution could be improved is by aiming for the head instead of the heart.