SO, SOME ACCOUNT ON IMGFLIP UNDER THE NAME "MEMESONLYSMARTPEOPLEGET" POSTS A MEME WITH ONLY ONE UPVOTE ON DECEMBER 28TH THAT IS TITLED: "READ THE HOLOCAUST: REFLECTIONS ON THE EXPLOITATION OF JEWISH SUFFERING BY NORMAN FINKLESTEIN (HE'S A JEW, MODS)." NEXT THING I CURIOUSLY INQUIRE IN A REPLY TO HIS MEME UNDER THIS TITLE WITHIN THEIR MEME THAT STATES: "BEFORE IT WAS CALLED ZIONISM, IT WAS CALLED THE ZIONIST FASCIST PARTY" MY REPLY: "KNOW ANY ANTI-SEMITIC IGNORANT LIBWEIRDOS?" & FOR SOME REASON THE ACCOUNT MUST HAVE TAKEN IT PERSONALLY, & HOW COULD THAT BE ? FOR THE NEXT THING I KNOW I'M IN A 24HR TIMEOUT FROM COMMENTING, AND I'M TOLD BY THE MOD IN A NOTIFICATION THAT THIS IS FOR ABUSE AGAINST THE RULES OF IMGLFIP FOR 'INSULTING ANOTHER USER'; SO I'M CURIOUS, AS IT IS OKAY TO POST A MEME THAT JUST MIGHT BE INTERPRETED AS INSULTING TO AN ENTIRE RELIGION AND AN ENTIRE NATION OF ISRAEL; IS NOT AS INSULTING AS POINTING THIS OUT TO THE MEMER THAT CALLING PEOPLE FASCIST MIGHT BE PERCEIVED AS AN UNEDUCATED STATEMENT BY A LIBERAL LEFTIST? HOW WEIRD. STRANGE THAT A MOD MIGHT TAKE SIDES WITH THE OFFENDER AS BEING MARGINALIZED AND VULNERABLE AND A VICTIM OF NAME CALLING, WHILST PRECISELY DOING SO WITHIN THEIR OWN MEME THEY WERE GETTING CALLED OUT UPON BY FREE SPEECH. YOU BE THE JUDGE. MIGHT THAT MEME BE INAPPROPRIATE? THEY ENDED UP DISABLING COMMENTS IN THE AFTERMATH FOR THEIR FEELS ARE LIKELY TOO SENSITIVE. UNREAL. MIND YOU, THIS IS 2025, NOT 2026 YET. IN 2026, MAKING A MEME CALLING SOMEONE FASCIST, MIGHT IN THE FUTURE BE AN INDICATOR OF THE EXISTANCE OF AN ANTI-SEMITIC UNEDUCATED LIBWEIRDO COMMONLY CALLED IGNORANT IN LAYMANS TERMS.