some of my posts here were unfeatured for "NSFW" despite being squeaky clean COINCIDENTALLY when certain someone noticed it (Tha

Lemme see the image

The meme was about the antifur reaction to learning about twokinds

The meme was clearly implying sexual stuff and was made to start drama.

Exactly

I disapproved it because the emojis in it were implying trace and flora “did it.” The pregnant woman, the smirk, the eggplant and the tiger emoji should have been more than enough. You shouldn’t have done that on a stream with minors. If you haven’t read the rules, read them. “No yiff, or implications of yiff.” Read up.

They don't say anything about implications. also i have a feeling if Flora was with another tiger keidran you wouldn't give a damn. plus not even the original comic has any explicit sex scenes

Specifically they're only implied with no further explicit details.

I am not accusing current mods that they are antifurs or something, It was probably unfeatured since it drew their attention. but i am saying that they still control this stream in some way despite not being mods

Nobody is controling anything. Your meme was borderline innapropriate content. This stream has a lot of minors in it. So making references to sexual stuff, gooning or fetishes is messed up.

Twokinds is recommended as 13+. around the age you are allowed to make account on this site. The meme or original comics don't feature any pornography and only referenced the comics. the only thing was that it referenced trace (human) and flora (sapient tigress) relationship. i bet if it was keidran + keidran relationship you wouldn't care that much

"recommended as 13+. around the age you are allowed to make account on this site."

Yeah, reccomendations are not always accurate or done by people with standards. And as you said, the creator biasedely gave the recommendation despite the weird nsfw and fetish conent.

As for the other stuff.

1) You are not starting another argument over this stuff.

2) That does not matter. Its simply too innapropriate.

Also don't you find it strange that it was unfeatured almost as soon as you noticed it. plus the 13+ recommendation was suggested by the author Thomas Fischbach himself

"the 13+ recommendation was suggested by the author Thomas Fischbach himself"

That is an example of bias from the creator. Its simply too innapropriate.