Yes, technocracy is widely seen as anti-democratic because it prioritizes rule by technical experts over popular consent, potentially sidelining public will and accountability, though some argue it can complement or exist within democracies by improving expert input in complex areas. Critics argue it leads to rule by an unelected elite, creating an "aristocracy of experts" and reducing citizen involvement, which clashes with democratic ideals of representation and majority rule.
Why it's considered anti-democratic:
Expert Rule vs. Popular Sovereignty: Technocracy vests power in individuals with specialized knowledge, not those elected by the public, shifting power away from voters.
Depoliticization: It aims to remove complex policy decisions from political debate and place them in the hands of impartial experts, effectively bypassing democratic processes.
Lack of Accountability: Technocrats aren't directly accountable to the electorate through elections, potentially leading to decisions that serve narrow interests or ignore public needs.
Elite Control: It risks creating an elite class (technocrats) making decisions without public input, diminishing the role of the general citizenry in governance.
Nuances and Counterarguments:
Not Always an Absolute Alternative: Technocracy isn't always a total replacement for democracy; it can refer to expert-led aspects of government (like central banks) within a democratic framework.
"Technocratic Democracy": Some theories discuss "technocratic democracies" where experts maximize welfare, coexisting with democratic structures, but still potentially diverging from majority preferences.
Response to Democratic Failures: Technocratic governments sometimes emerge during crises (like the Eurocrisis) as a way to offer competent, performance-oriented governance when elected bodies fail, offering a different model of representation.
In essence, while democracy values participation and majority rule, technocracy values efficiency and expertise, often putting it in tension with democratic principles.