Grammar

i suggest making no silent letters

makes sense to me

Tækat

VSO

What's that TLA?

Word order, verb subject object

Ah, like eat I cake

Do we want verb, subject, direct object, indirect object (Give I the package him)? Cause that would make more sense to me from a purely logical standpoint; however, I know English, Spanish, and German usually put the indirect object before the direct object (I give him the package), so maybe V,S,IO,DO makes more sense so that we don't make things too confusing (Give I him the package).

or we could make no specific syntax like japanese or polish

I like this idea

Make long words like in German, even for most absurd situations that will never happen and will just be a joke

morphology
ly=bas
ness=tuh
ology=yæsht..

ill have to continue tomorrow

please can it be an agglutanive language

explain

adding on suffixes that makes a word longer but gives it more meaning

eg: Turkish muvaffakiyetsizleştiricileştiriveremeyebileceklerimizdenmişsinizcesine meaning "as though you are from those whom we may not be able to easily make into a maker of unsuccessful ones"

DEFINITELY

How about we do away with verb conjugation, except to indicate tense?
-pe = past tense suffix
-ve = future tense suffix
No suffix = present tense

nice

Pronouns:
I = sa
You = pa
He = ka
She = va
They (singular) = ta
It = ya

We (not including you) = stu
We (including you) = spu
You (plural) = pu
They (plural, people) = tu
They (plural, objects) = yu

I suppose, logically, that would leave room for more, optional pronouns. If you notice the pattern, I guess it would also leave room for sta, sya, sva, vu, and ku, if you can guess what those mean :)

we need a you that adresses someone with less points

na

I suggest making it phonetic

k