My guy, your "post" will get fact-checked as false because of the line "no one is studying fully unvaccinated kids vs fully vaccinated ones". Like all pseudo-science, you begin with a false conclusion that is devoid of facts or evidence and then attribute all manner of ills to it. AND when science does look into it, and finds no connection at all, you immediately claim something like "big pharma is lying!!!" or similar.
You already believe a conclusion and reject anything that doesn't support that conclusion.
Like you probably believe that vaccines are behind the increased autism rates. And when you're presented with the reams of science that show that's not the case, you hand wave it away and continue on with your baseless conclusion.
That's why you get fact-checked and taken down as false. You claim 'you're just asking questions' but when you get answers that contradict what you want, you reject them.
And then, on top of that, when we do try to do something about things like childhood obesity, you start campaigns defending the right of parents to feed their babies deep-fried twinkies. Or reduce pollution, which we know drives asthma,
What has been your response to that? How's that anti-ev campaign you're always on going? what about green energy sources? Yeah? how is that?
We already know the answers to your "questions". You don't like the answers and you work to make things worse.
