Breaking news: the Department of State is considering revoking visa of anyone who makes fun of Charlie Kirk

I'm not a democrat. Also you can't cry foul about political violence when you are all for throwing immigrants into alligator pits.

1. They're ILLIGAL immigrants, they blatantly ignored immigration law and simply aren't citizens in the same way LEGAL immigrants are. If you break the law, you get punished. Trump is simply enforcing laws that were already there, laws that the Biden administration blatantly refused to enforce.

2. They're not getting thrown into an alligator pit, they're thrown into a detention center. The only way they might become alligator food is if they break out. It's no different than an escapee getting shot or mauled by a guard's dogs for breaking out. If they didn't want to get deported, they shouldn't have broken the law and simply used legal avenues to immigrate.

3. There's a difference between political violence and enforcing the law. You guys were always about nobody being above the law before you lost control over shaping it. There's a difference between attacking someone for different political beliefs like you guys love to do, and arresting killers and other sociopaths.

Illegal immigration doesn't deserve cruel and unusual punishment and being arrested at whim without due process. Kyle Rittenhouse crossed state lines while carrying a loaded weapon, do you think he deserved to be arrested at whim without due process? I certainly don't think so, I am glad he was given a fair trial with due process and not convicted for murder for he was attacked by violent antifa rioters. Not all illegal immigrants are hardened criminals, some are simply escaping the unsafe shithole country they lived in and seek a better life for themselves and their families. If they get arrested they do deserve to be given the chance to prove themselves innocent and not criminals like gangsters or drug traffickers and if they are such hardened criminals they do deserve to be locked up. I know a guy from Brazil who came to Canada originally on a student visa but he stayed longer than the visa let him and got a job in the construction industry and proved himself to be a very good worker. He later got his immigration certificate sorted out and is now a fully legal immigrant. Do you think he deserved to be thrown in prison? Also I wouldn't call arresting people at whim and unlawful search of people's private homes "enforcing the law". During the covid lockdowns, the police arrested people just for going to the park their friends, would you call that "basic law enforcement"? Also do you really think crossing the border without papers is the equivalent of murder? And I do not care for your bullshit of labeling me as part of the group you call "you guys" because I am not a democrat and I also don't care for you falsely accusing me of wanting people attacked for their political beliefs, in fact even though I hate Charlie Kirk, I do believe this shooting does mean that more people could get wrongfully killed just for having different views and things like this should be prevented.

Eh, you sure do behave like the average Dem to me. But the punishment is NOT cruel and unusual. Unlike the few illegals rounded up during Democrat rule that were left to bake in the hot sun (with the kids in cages thing being during Obama's time btw), they are now detained in a fully airconditioned place with plenty of amenities such as books and video games until they're deported back to their home countries. And while I do agree not every illegal is a hardened criminal, you have to admit that every hardened criminal that entered the country is much more likely to be an illegal than not, and those are the ones that are getting prioritized. Killmar for example was a human trafficker with ties to MS13, and there are records of his ex filing a restraining order prior to his face getting all over the news.

But I do guess my POV is a bit different from yours, as I live in another country facing an illegal immigrant crisis. And believe me, there's quite a lot of illegals/asylum seekers that do nothing but collect paychecks from the taxes of the locals while causing us nothing but trouble and refusing to integrate into our society. Not saying they're all like that, but a lot of them are. Not the Ukrainian asylum seekers though, they usually integrate well into our cultural melting pot.

As for that friend of yours, while he did stay a bit longer than was legally allowed, he did eventually try and do things the right way, which is a lot more than most of the people getting arrested by ICE can say. Besides, from everything I've seen, ICE doesn't need a warrant to arrest someone. Also, most illegals don't seem to care about due process when they break in, so why should ICE care about pushing them back out? And I never said it's the equivalent of murder, I just think countries should just send people that went in illegally back to their home. Murderers deserve the death penalty if you ask me, so these guys are getting off too easily for me. Also, why should countries like the USA be responsible for the criminals of, say, El Salvador? I say just send them back and let their own countries deal with their own problems, and not let them pass the responsibility to others.

https://abc7.com/post/state-department-suggests-revoking-visas-making-light-charlie-kirks-death/17796870/

So you are happy about such a thing happening? You are not so pro-free speech as your party claims to be. You would probably cry foul if it were a Kamala-run administration banning people for saying racial slurs, I also wouldn't be for such a thing but the same applies to making fun of Charlie Kirk. Also why ban people for making fun of Charlie Kirk? He wasn't even a person in power or any sort of politician or had any connection to the government, he was just an amateur propagandist.

You van arrogantly insult all you want, that doesn't change the fact that head of Department of State Marco Rubio is considering revoking the visas of anyone who mocks Charlie Kirk's death and I just posted the news article proving it. Now are you for banning anyone mocking Charlie Kirk? Yes or no?

Sorry my bad, it was actually the deputy secretary of state that suggested such a thing and he didn't specifically mention Charlie Kirk by name, he meant making fun of anyone's death in general but if one can be deported for making fun of Charlie Kirk's death then one can easily be deported for making fun of George Floyd's death and I'm pretty sure you don't want that.

St George the Floyd killed himself with an overdose of fentanyl. Kirk was murdered by a guy who turns out to be living with his trans lover. You know… the guy your side claims to be a far-right MAGA Trump supporter. 😂
I can’t be deported… I was born here.

That doesn't matter both count as deaths one could get in trouble for making fun of and everyone thinks George Floyd was killed by the police officer. Also you may not be able to be deported but an immigrant who wants to come to America is likely to have their visa revoked for making fun of George Floyd as well as Charlie Kirk even if they do come to the country legally trying to get the proper paperwork. I wouldn't act so smug and arrogant if I were you.

But you do act smug and arrogant. On a daily basis.

You and your projections, also just so you know if a democrat-run government tried to arrest you over some social media post they didn't like, I wouldn't spitefully be happy about such a thing happening to you, I would defend your right to free speech even though you were shitty to me.

No you wouldn’t