I have a friend who's a pediatrician and posts useful data on Facebook.

let's keep the safe vaxes and try to make them better, and get rid of the bad ones that killed people.

since some people could have an adverse reaction to any vaccine, why don't we keep all the vaccines that save many more lives than they threaten?

You are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT to correlate this to the advent of actual Vaccines which demonstrate efficacy and THE ABILITY TO STOP TRANSMISSION at one to 3 doses, PERIOD.

Do the Flu Shots, or the mRna immune system booster juice jabs that are required annually,
work in this same way ?

Are they Actual VACCINES, if they do not?
Why must you insist on calling them Vaccines,
when they clearly are NOT vaccines,
nor do they work as well as ACTUAL vaccines work ?

you are a peculiar sort of Almanac, dear user. let me correct you in the hope that the information will be disseminated accurately.

this idea that vaccines stop transmission is wrong. maybe you got it from someone who doesn't check for accuracy of information before spreading it further? anyway, all vaccines update your immune system. they reduce viral transmission in the general population. they can't stop it entirely because there are always unvaccinated individuals out there spreading the mess around. and this has always been true. you may be confusing immunization with a cure, which vaccines have never been. vaccines can in principle reduce transmission to zero IF enough people are vaccinated such that the population's infection level goes to zero. i guess then we could call it a cure.

flu shots do work the same way, yes, good question! but they're recommended annually, especially for the elderly and immunocompromised people, because the various strains of the flu virus mutate regularly, so the new strains have to be accounted for on an ongoing basis.

the mRNA vaccines are called vaccines because although they introduce the antigen to the body in a different way, the role of the antigen and the immune system are the same after that point as in conventional vaccines. are you right to be concerned about the risks of mRNA vaccines? absolutely. but we weigh those risks against the known consequences of not being vaccinated. once you've almost died because of a viral infection, it makes you much more interested and knowlegeable about vaccination and other medicinal options.

mRNA vaccines show good efficacy against Covid, but as with the flu vaccine, it has to be updated every year because of the rapid rate of viral mutations.

i'm a practicing enzymologist familiar with the detailed biochemistry of the mRNA vaccines. i've made a detailed study of Covid-19, the virus that almost killed me in 2020. let me know if you have other questions about vaccination or the efficacy and risks involved.

First off, my condolences and empathy sincerely as a human pour out to you in sympathy for you for
'almost' dying. That which does not kill you makes you stronger. So, congratulations, you are still here.

My question is can you provide links to ANY ONE RANDOMIZED STUDY that supports your claims regarding the detailed biochemistry of the mRNA vaccines ? One please, several preferred.
WTH is an enzymologist? Are you an MD ? Or a D.O. or Chiropractor with former hopes of getting a better MCAT score ?

The mRNA "vaccines" do not demonstrate that they help more than 2 months in duration.
If you have information contradicting that statement, please provide a link.
If these help better than that for people, then take it. Giving it to the elderly and immunocompromised people as you state, is a stellar idea.
Unfortunately, That is not what happened now is it?.

The medical establishment in the USA is doling it out to people as young as 10months old and in EUROPE they do not give it to children under 12. What gives?
If you've "almost died" because of a viral infection, you are NOT more knowlegable, yet possibly more interested. To assert otherwise is gossip.

The rapid rate of viral mutations is ALWAYS WEAKER than the previous virus. To lack any mention of the SPANISH FLU and why the medical establishment is not as fearful of that deadly virus is rather of interest. THINK ABOUT IT.
It is still here, yet every mutation gets weaker than the one prior. Not stronger.
What immunology text are you reading ?

Polio Vaccine stops acquisition, thus transmission.
Measles Vaccine Stops acquisition, thus transmission
Mumps and Rubella Vaccine stops acquisition thus transmission.
Meningitis Vaccine stops acquisition thus transmission.
Small Pox Vaccine, oh wait, that has been eradicated since the mid 1960's.
They do not even give that to children anymore. Why is that?

If what's stated is peculiar, yet accurate, sort of observation to you, then so be it.

Enjoy your unending quest towards enzymology exceptionalism, and allergies, and big words in general. Some day, you may reach the highest eschelons of Protein catalyst joys, as Linus Pauling did sucking down thousands of milligrams of Vitamin C ever shown to be effective for the human, yet excreted every time he took a leak. He never became an M.D.

Get back to us with that link to a Randomized study or two, related to supporting your claims on how the CoVax Jabs work when you find one.

So, not even One Randomized Study that you can cite to support your claims.
Got it.

Guess we learn here what "a peculiar sort" is to you.
Apparently, a peculiar sort, is the kind that asks questions that challenge your premise.

Quid Pro Quo for your own rant