And now there is a scientic backing for it

Agreed.
Much of the impulse in human culture to create a religion is driven by people's own existential angst, their innate and instinctive fear of death, their own death and the death of the people they love. It can seem easier to deal with death by convincing ourselves that it is not real. "My loved one is not dead - they are in heaven and we will see each other again!" ... "Of course I will never 'die!' that's absurd! I'll just go to a 'better' place."

The other impulse in human culture is the desire for power and money. An all powerful god wouldn't need your money but his reps are always crowing about the tithe. Power and wealth. Power over other men. Power over women. Power over culture. Power over society. That's all religion is truly about at its core.

You all need to make the most of the time you actually do have. You are mortal. Death is real ... get over it. I sincerely and earnestly do not believe that god or gods exist because there hasn't been any compelling evidence presented to me (and I started looking for it over years ago, went to xtian schools, seminary, became a preacher, missionary, and church planter). But you xtians have each other to go to "worship" with your imaginary god. Perhaps that could bring meaning to your lives as you comfort and console each other when bad things happen, blaming them on sin and the devil, and give credit to your god when the good things happen, all while ignoring the fact that anything that could be called a god would be in control of it all (kinda like Isaiah says in chapter 46:7).

The god of the buybull is not omnipotent. He is incapable of communicating clearly. If he were omnipotent, he could write a clearly understandable book, and we wouldn't have Presbyterians and Baptists and Catholics and 30,000 other denominations all disagreeing with each other as well as billions of people in other religions.

Nobody has a valid argument for the existence of God. If somebody did, that argument would come up in every debate about the existence of God. That person would win the Nobel Prize. It would be headline news. Over and over. NO ONE would be able to refute it. Instead, TikTok/Imgflip/YouTube apologists constantly seek ways to find a “gotcha-loophole” and they always get destroyed once someone actually examines their new tack. Playing with apologists is a constant game of whack-a-mole where the moles never win but they keep on popping up with what they think is a new argument.