@Acid_Freak

I'ma say this, as an agnostic, I am against satanism.

because if there was a god of destruction, it would not create.

Satan isn’t a god
He doesn’t rule over hell
Satanism is a branch of agnosticism

technically any ""deity"" with a large amount of control over large environments is considered a god

in other words, if we got enough humans together, and they managed to become a type 2 civilization, we could technically call that group a demigod, however the individuals themselves would not be a demigod

if they managed to reach across galaxies, all the humans would then collectively be considered a "god" by that definition, but an individual or a large group of said individuals would not be.

.
now, if there was a room, and nothing existed but that room, and there was an elephant in that room, the elephant would be considered a god, however if you put that room in a universe then the elephant would no longer be considered a god by those terms

in other words, what defines something as a "god" is the power it has over a certain scale to modify it's surroundings

Ok but who where did the room come from and who created the room? Not the elephant, that’s for sure.

Even by your own standards, Satan isn’t a god because he doesn’t have control over any place or environment.

it depends

there is such thing as polytheism, which can also count evil deities as "gods" of destruction

remember, destruction can't create, but it can heavily modify surroundings

We’re talking about Satanism, which is connected to the one, monotheistic God in the Bible. Satan, or Lucifer, is a fallen angel. Not a god.

Well I'm talking from a standpoint that follows the logic of most religions, meaning that a "god" is anything that can change a large amount of its surroundings, or

CREATE PLACES.

Also, torturing billions would be considered a LARGE amount of control, however he's probably actually tortured TRILLIONS all at once, meaning that well then that's a god-level scale,

And once again, destruction cannot create, meaning that he would not be considered a god in the traditional sense. And because destruction cannot create, satanism is one of the many impossible religions, meaning it cannot be correct no matter what

because destruction does not create.

it's like telling a sledgehammer to build the Burj khalifa, it can destroy it but it cannot make it

satanism is a contradiction, meaning it is one of the infinite examples of an impossible religion

yet there are also infinite possible correct religions

Type shit

Nah, I still try to practice occultism