dude, no matter what you believe, it's ludicrous to compare it to the killing of millions of jews, there's no way you honestly agree with this post. this dehumanisation was not a philosophical debate like abortion is, it was a calculated strategy to facilitate mass murder. the idea of the 2 groups being "not actual people" is completely different in each case. The Nazi's argument was as a tool of hate, and to justify genocide. The pro-choice argument is a debate about the point at which a fetus gains personhood, and is a complex ethical debate that has factors like maternal health risks (sometimes, continuing a pregnancy poses a serious threat to the mother's life or physical health as pre-existing conditions like severe heart disease, kidney problems, or certain cancers can be exacerbated by pregnancy + pregnancy complications, such as ectopic pregnancy [where the fertilized egg implants outside the uterus] or severe pre-eclampsia [a dangerous form of high blood pressure], can also necessitate termination to save the mother's life, fetal abnormalities (prenatal testing can sometimes reveal severe fetal abnormalities that are incompatible with life or would result in a very short and painful life for the child), and I don't really wanna get into it on here as it's a horrible subject but also pregnancies resulting from r@pe or incest can cause significant trauma for the mother, idk about you but I wouldn't wanna compare these women to nazis.
