Monarchism is the correct way

Based

Monarchism is the truest and finest of ideologies, without a doubt. Just look at history—take the Akkadian Empire, for example, the first to unite Mesopotamia under Sargon, whose reign brought strength and unity to the land. Then think of empires like Britain, France, and Russia, all thriving under monarchs who provided stability, direction, and a sense of purpose. Monarchs weren’t just leaders; they were the heart and soul of their nations, guiding their people through tough times and ensuring their lands remained strong. Unlike the chaos of modern elections and political infighting, monarchies brought steadiness and pride. Monarchism isn’t some outdated idea; it’s a link to our past and a path to the future. A king doesn’t answer to factions or political games—he answers to the people, the land, and his own legacy. Monarchism gives us what democracy often can’t: real leadership, honour, and a shared sense of purpose. Long live the crown, for it is the light that guides us through the ages.

My brother in christ if you knew anything about European monarchies of old you'd know that is not the case by a long shot

He’s talking about capitalism not monarchism

Pretty sure bro is talking about monarchism when he says "monarchism gives us what democracy often can't", "Empires like Britain, France and Russia, all thriving under monarchs" and "monarchism is the truest and finest of ideologies, without a doubt"

But they mostly use the feudal system which is dogshit

Yes, but that's not why the monarchies fell

I know but it’s because in the case of France and Russia all monarchies have to go to shit at one point and in Britain’s case people just found it better to be ruled by a government official than a king so the monarchy gradually lost its power to make decisions and stuff like that

And also the feudal system makes people fed up at one point so technically yes

With both France and Russia, it was urbanisation and a growing middle class of revolutionaries that were catalysed into revolution by a consistent drop in living standards over the course of several years caused by the Seven Year's and American Revolutionary wars in France, and WW1 in Russia. The reason this didn't happen in Britain is that the monarch's power was eroded by the nobility and mercantile classes over hundreds of years, and by the time a truly traumatic war reached Britain in 1914, the working class had enough representation in parliament to demand universal suffrage, which they got in 1928.

In other words, the only reason the British Monarchy never collapsed was because it was never absolutist after 1250. The absolute monarchies of France and Russia were simply not able to survive industrialisation and urbanisation, jence monarchy is an inherently flawed system of governance.

That’s kinda what I mean

If you mean that absolute monarchies can only effectively rule feudal kingdoms and different forms of government are needed to effectively advance towards and through industrialisation without falling into police states (as did Germany, Austria and Russia in their twilight years), then yes. Mb, I didn't quite get what you were trynna say

One thing we agree on

the fudal state did not exist until the 9th century AD, from the unstable Frankish empire,

and that was chatgpt generated,

Monarchism is the truest and finest of ideologies, without a doubt. Just look at history—take the Akkadian Empire, for example, the first to unite Mesopotamia under Sargon, whose reign brought strength and unity to the land. Then think of empires like Britain, France, and Russia, all thriving under monarchs who provided stability and greatness. Monarchs weren’t just leaders; they were the heart and soul of their nations, guiding their people through tough times and ensuring their lands remained strong. Unlike the chaos of modern elections and political infighting, monarchies brought steadiness and pride. Monarchism isn’t some outdated idea; it’s a link to our past and a path to the future. Monarchism gives us what democracy often can’t: real leadership, honour. Long live the crown, for it is the light that guides us through the ages.(Updated)

Version 1.3

1.1 of this text

But what you don’t mention is that they all had to go to shit at one point because of either incompetent rulers, or some other shit, or wars.

its to be expected, all countrys have a dark sometimes

Including monarchies

yes, all states have a dark time, it could last a year, a century, or a millennia

So then if all states have dark times why are you saying monarchism is the best way to rule a country

France circa the 1790’s Russia circa 1918 Germany circa 1918 as well

because it works

Your updated version is still objectively false. Not on technicalities, but on its base assertions

and, its chatgpt, complain to them

I have no words. It doesn't matter if it's chatgpt or not. You've clearly expressed support for monarchism, no? Not only in these bullshittery ai fueled yap sessions, but also when you said "monarchy is the correct way" and "monarchy: the only way" and the imperial russian crown. If you support monarchism, have the balls to stand by what you said. I don't care if you had some minor factual inaccuracies in your general purpose monarchist paragraph you seemingly have on hand, I care that you're a monarchist, and I'm questioning why you are one

because i am a uy who looks back, monarchism has worked for millennia, Feudalism was a speck in the way of the monarchist, it was caused by the decentralization of an empire such as in the Carolingian Empire and then it spread throughout the world

it was not the ideal way to rule

but there is one way to rule witch is the best

Guess which one it is according to your “evidence”

Enlightened Absolutism, but i prefer the second part of the name

But absolutism always ends in shit

not always

Give me an example then

Fredrick the Great, Catherine the great

Give man the mic rn

Monarchy: The Only Way

Gtfo

Lmfao

9ofl48.jpg (click to show) fixed your meme

BC this is causing an argument no doubt