Rules are where rules should be.
It's obvious that mods are scrolling by them instead of reading them, but there's no guarantee that they would read them if they're in the stream description.
; But we must assume that mods know all the rules, as it is their job to enforce them, so warning a mod doesn't make sense and the first offense must result in removal. <----That goes for you too, buster
Funny how you give Vik a pass on the Exact same thing you take Jack's mod away for. They BOTH abused their moderation ability both should be stripped of their moderation status.
sorry for not replying previously. your comment was lost in notifs 😿
Vik doesn't have a history of spitemodding. What they did is absolutely considered an offense, and they were handed a warning after which it didn't happen. Other mods with weirder histories were not so lucky 💔
; Warning users when they accidentally break a rule instead of banning them is a good idea. But we must assume that mods know all the rules, as it is their job to enforce them, so warning a mod doesn't make sense and the first offense must result in removal.
Your honor; Warning users when they accidentally break a rule instead of banning them is a good idea. But we must assume that mods know all the rules, as it is their job to enforce them, so warning a mod doesn't make sense and the first offense must result in removal.
Caption this Meme
