Imgflip Logo Icon

Lisa Simpson's Presentation

Lisa Simpson's Presentation | I find it interesting when I look at depictions of 4d figures, because realistically, it would be nearly impossible to show because it really would be an infinite number of 3d figures overlapping eachother nearly perfectly or occupying nearly the same space, but the difference of this space creates the existing of the 4d/3d enviroment | image tagged in lisa simpson's presentation | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
75 views 1 upvote Made by Negu 6 days ago in MS_memer_group
Lisa Simpson's Presentation memeCaption this Meme
39 Comments
0 ups, 6d,
2 replies
Tesseract.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
No the depiction is very limited and flawed
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
It's a mathematical depiction. If a 4d tesseract passes through our plane it will appear as a 3d cube getting bigger and then shrinking again.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
assuming the 4d figure carries the physical characteristics of a 3d cube
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Yes, otherwise it wouldn't be a tesseract.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
then any 3d cube would be a tesseract because it can be presumed as moving through a 3d plane, the idea of it existing outside of this dimesion would grant it different characteristics, and that's why I say the idea is flawed
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
But if a "squared" geometry exists in 1d, 2d, and 3d, can it not be implied to exist in 4d?
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
it can, just doesn't interact the same as others, like how a square interacts differently than a cube
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Well of course, as all dimensions of geometry have at least some variation in their laws.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
okay then, you just proved my point
0 ups, 6d
I had assumed you meant that a 4d cube would not appear as a standard 3d cube if it passed through our dimension.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
no I'm saying it wouldn't have the same properties as one
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Well of course. I was simply saying it is like a cube passing through a 2d plane.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
... that's what I said ...
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
And I agree with you.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
k then
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Fun discussion. Glad to see other smart people here.
0 ups, 6d
:thumbs up:
0 ups, 6d,
2 replies
But isn't everything on our screens 2d
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
no, the projection of the lights on our screen happens over a very small 3d space
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
The light is projected as a 2d plane.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
that is what we see, you can also say the surface of a cube is 2d, but does that mean the cube is? No
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
But on a screen there is nothing but a surface. There is do depth.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
and so is the surface of a cube
0 ups, 6d,
2 replies
The cube irl has depth, the cube on a screen doesn't.
It doesn't matter what we see, this is a fact.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
so what we see doesn't matter? then the world is 2d according to you
0 ups, 6d
What our brains perceive doesn't change reality.
We do not have telekinesis.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
I said a real cube, just a surface of it, a side so to say.
you said a cube on a screen is 2d. how about this. Is the distance between a projector and its projection 2d?
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Oh so you're saying that the lightwaves traveling makes the shape 3d? As if it were a hologram?
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
yes, the idea that the light having to travel any distance gives the object or ---->screen<---- depth
0 ups, 6d
So it's basically a 3d trapezoid of light.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
yes, essentialy
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
OK fine, you got me.
It is possible to display a 3D shape on a screen.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
not what I said, I said the screen itself is 3d, especially the distance between the micro pixels and the screen
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Oh.
So it's technically 3d.
0 ups, 5d,
1 reply
Not technically, anything with length width & height is 3d
1 up, 4d,
1 reply
Very interesting argument.
0 ups, 4d,
1 reply
literally how geometry works but okay
0 ups, 4d
Lisa Simpson's Presentation memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
I find it interesting when I look at depictions of 4d figures, because realistically, it would be nearly impossible to show because it really would be an infinite number of 3d figures overlapping eachother nearly perfectly or occupying nearly the same space, but the difference of this space creates the existing of the 4d/3d enviroment