Twitter gave me some experience

The classic "They're not real kids they're work of fiction."

Yeah you still have a child fetish, that's why you like lolis. If you showed this stuff to your date, she will not find you hot. She will think you're creepy because you have a child fetish.

And the sub argument "Schizo" where the say you're schizophrenic because you don't like lolis, because they think you're trying to save them.

First of all, you're the schizophrenic one for thinking we are trying to 'save' them like of course not, second, you're watering down the word 'schizo'.

"You should be helping out grooming victims instead of getting mad over fiction"

Wow I am such a terrible person. I am at school doing schoolwork when I should be helping out the poor. I'm so sorry man.

"Loli is legal"

No tf it isn't. By law, it says that loli has to be indistinguishable from real kids in order to be illegal.

"Yeah but they don't look like spot on depictions of actual, real life children!"

Yeah, Finn the Human doesn't look like a spot on depiction of an actual, real life human. By your logic, he is not human?

Furthermore you could argue that even if it were legal it would not be morally acceptable. There are many things in this world which are technically legal but would be scrutinized by any normal person for being not okay. Saying that something legal automatically implies that the legal system is perfect, which when you consider that there have literally been things like wrongful executions (there was literally one in Missouri just yesterday even after proof was given by his prosecutor showed that the guy who did it was innocent) shows that the legal system is far from perfect

Gonna use this against Hannibal

Parotting drek from Twitter. Brilliant.

The only relevant argument against loli is that normalizing the sexualization of children is abhorrent, harms many and helps none. Unfortunately for all involved, good taste and proper judgement have never been my strong suits. Hence my profile description. (Multiple people have put me on their profile descriptions, but not many seem to actually read and comprehend mine.) I also still use slurs and perpetuate racist/sexist/other horrible jokes, but nobody accused me of being racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, etc. The only ones who missed the memo that jokes aren't serious seems to be y'all.

By saying "proper judgement has never been my strong suit" you just brought the ultimate argument to why you shouldn't be a mod in MSMG. So congrats, you played yourself.

Also people didn't accuse you of being racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic since I didn't see you do a single racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic joke. After you got mod in MSMG I didn't see you do one, and before you got mod you only posted Hentai anyway.

Well it's good you didn't find fault with my argument against lolis. It's also good to know we can throw every other argument against me being mod in the trash. I look forward to everyone shifting their focus to my improper judgement.

As for your assessment of what I've posted in the past, you see only what you want to see. Interesting "hentai" is the only thing that registers to you.

"You're watering down pedophilia and that is an insult by grooming victims"

Yeah, I bet a grooming victim is balling their eyes out because they saw me arguing with a jackass like you.

"Yeah EDP said Lolis are bad, and he turned out to be a pedophile, that mean you're a closeted pedo as well."

Yeah they just point the fingers at me when they don't get their way. Like I'm not even old enough to be a pedo yet.

By definition a pedophile is someone sexually attracted to minors. Their age isn't a factor. You're welcome to campaign for changes to the dictionary if you like.

The EDP argument is still invalid. It would be as if someone would say "a white guy commited a school shooting, so all white guys commit school shootings."

And you should understand that this sentence is bullshit, and so is the one with EDP.

Like I told c-moon, feel free to campaign for changes to the dictionary. You might want to study up on analogies while you're at it. Yours was like saying "that guy is attracted to children, so all guys are attracted to children". It misses the mark, but comes closer to making my point than refuting it. :/

I never once mentioned you yet you somehow found this. You probably got insecure when you somehow saw this and had to run your stupid mouth. I shouldn't've even made this, because freaks like you keep trying to defend animated child porn with your lives like it's something to fight about and defend about. Like I can't wrap my head around that. If you post a picture of a 14 year old's upskirt, a minor's upskirt, and say "would", that is pedophilia because you're attracted to a minor. No ifs, ands, or buts. Like why are you keep trying to defend that like the greasy old dickhead that you are?

You didn't mention me on this meme. Good job. You lose that point by implying that it's fine for everyone else to comment on other people's memes but not for me.

Slow your roll dude, you're attacking a strawman. None of what you said here applies to me. And you obviously didn't even READ my comment on this meme. If you're not okay with people commenting their thoughts on your memes, disable comments. If you're not okay with me commenting on your memes, block me. Either way the problem is with you.

And if you do want to banter in the future, maybe try addressing what I've actually said instead of attacking some formless voice in your own head.