.

Occasionally I'll post the old Blocking and Following screenshot.

Ah cool
So have you been ignoring me?
There's just been quite a few times I've attempted to converse that were pretty much shut down

Shut down? That sounds made up.

I don't have a lot of time for users who live in their make believe bubble. Hows that side project going?

Again, there's no need for the hostility. We both know you're asking a rhetorical question and you don't particularly care.

Proving you are wrong is not hostility, its good old fashioned fun.

I neither ignore you nor block you.

imgflip.com/i/92t3e3
imgflip.com/i/90c0gw

I just don't have a lot of time to interact with you about your made up, imaginary bullshit.

"I wasn't making an actual point to be honest. I don't believe you actually want to destroy this place, however I do believe you hurt more than help. Not on purpose"

This is an opinion, and an opinion I backed up I'm the statement. Anyways I was also trying to thank you for still getting around to fixing the issue in the first place

It also seems that both times you refused to respond, and I think my statements in the second link are pretty compelling. If druid did anything ban worthy I don't see why you would feel the need to be so defensive about it.

I'm not defensive about a thing. I'm not super interested in spoon feeding your desperate need for attention and drama though.

I've said numerous times in this stream that Owners and Moderators are free to look up my actions.

You most certainly were andrew, and I would appreciate if you didn't resort to Ad Hominem. You refused to explain your reason for banning druid. I suppose "defensive" isnt as apt a descriptor as "dodging the question".

Sorry if you have issues.

I don't care if you ask Druid.

As i stated before, asking druid would give me a biased answer. And its not like you describe to people in detail what they did wrong all the time, sometimes you ban without much explanation. Therefore its smarter and more convenient to ask you. Your continued refusal to explain is all the more telling that you didn't have much of a reason at all for these bans.

If i am wrong, why don't you go ahead and explain it to me.

You are wrong.

I looked it up. I sent Druid. an explanation in the moderation note from the comment deletion(s) that resulted in a comment ban, which were deleted because the comments were against the Terms of Use.

As far as I'm concerned, Druid. breaking the Terms of Use is 𝘯𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴.

You can think I owe you an explanation of what the comment content was and why it was against the Terms, but I don't owe you that.

You can ask Druid about it. I don't care what his answer to you is.

I was simply asking in relation to my angry rampages comment. You asked how "upholding the tos" is an angry rampage. I in turn asked a question to further explain. I assumed you had banned him for little to no reason, and obviously the only way to know that isnt the case is by asking you.

You assumed. Great. Now we're getting somewhere.

It's not the only way for you to know. You can ask the user, they might tell you what happened.

If they tell you made up, imaginary bullshit and you believe it, that's a you problem.

You can't exactly tell when people are lying over the internet anyways. Are you this pissed off over me trying to ask you a question? I don't get how its this much trouble. Im trying to be respectful currently and contribute to a conversation, but you seem hardly inclined to do the same.

Lol not pissed off at all. You are somewhat amusing.

Look at your page. "Andrew either consistently ignores me or has me blocked at this point lmao"

It's neither!

I was not in fact talking directly to you. Now that I am, have I been disrespectful? If so how?

Ask yourself I suppose. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_such_thing_as_a_stupid_question

Imagine blocking Eclipse dude....

how do I block myself

you cease to exist

how do I block myself

like this

bye ion think he fw me

me neither lmao