Imgflip Logo Icon

This is for the Christians who hates trans people

This is for the Christians who hates trans people | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
181 views 22 upvotes Made by Matrozee 3 months ago in MS_memer_group
66 Comments
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Ngl that looks like penguinz0 as an angel.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
I mean it is penguinz0
0 ups, 3mo
Ah ok
[deleted] M
2 ups, 3mo
as a catholic i 100% agree
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
as a christian i dont care if someone is rainbow or something
0 ups, 3mo
👍
2 ups, 3mo
MoistCr1tiKal would actually say this. Just makes it all the more accurate.
2 ups, 3mo
True
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Plus isn't the you can't change your body thing in the Old Testament? The same Old Testament that also says that eating shrimp and wearing mixed fabrics is bad, yet many Christians do that anyway?
1 up, 3mo,
2 replies
Eating shrimp and stuff was only bad for the people who were being talked to. This wasn't a command of all, it was a command to those people who lived in the Old Testament.
1 up, 3mo
*a command to all of humanity
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Exactly, so why wouldn't the you can't change your body thing only be a command to the people who lived in the Old Testament and not where we are right now
1 up, 3mo
Because we can tell. Sometimes the Bible is just reviewing the events, and sometimes it's clear that the message is meant to be for the readers too. When God burns down two city's for Sodemy, it's clear that the message that sodemy is bad is for us. But when he tells Moses to stay in the desert for 40 years, it's clear that it's not meant for us.
1 up, 3mo,
2 replies
bible never says you can't change your body.
2 ups, 3mo,
4 replies
You can "change" your body, you can try to pretend your a different gender, the Bible did not say that was bad. But the truth is you cannot change gender magically with surgery, that's biologically impossible. Every cell in your body states weither you are male or female since birth. So marrying someone that is your real gender is Sodemy, and therefore sin. Maybe it isn't sin by itself, but how people use it is.
1 up, 3mo
Like stuff like plastic surgery is ok
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
*maybe "changing" your body isn't sin by itself
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Isn’t it a sin to get a tattoo though
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Please show me the verse where the Bible states this.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Leviticus 19:28
1 up, 3mo,
2 replies
This, again, is God speaking to Moses.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Oh
0 ups, 3mo
Neat
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
U sure?
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
The message is repeated no where else in the Bible, and anything directed to us is usually repeated somewhere else or in a book with all of its contents directed to us, like in the book of proverbs.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
God also once told his people not to eat meat, and here we are today. He gave them this rule to keep them from getting sick.
0 ups, 3mo
But he also said after making was kicked out of the garden that they could eat meat
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
What do you mean by "Marrying someone of your real gender is sodemy"?
0 ups, 3mo
If God burns down a city for Sodomy, and only gay sexual acts are not allowed, then maybe ur right. But, gay sexual acts are not actually possible, therefore the only thing that really happens is any "romantic" stuff. And if God burned down a city for only romantic actions, then therefore romantic actions aren't allowed. And all gay stuff can follow from this, and therefore, the only logical explanation is that gay is sin.

"Waisting your seed" was mostly meant about straight interactions, not Gay interactions. Sure, maybe God also meant to not waste it as in not wasting it AT ALL, but that action could be repeated alone, and that wouldn't be sodomy, the reason God burned down the 2 cities. (This is getting very descriptive, I am trying my best to be suddle.)

Let's recap:
1. Sodomy is either sexual gay interactions or any romantic gay actions.
2. Sodemy is NOT due to sexual gay interactions (because it is impossible).
3. Therefore, Sodemy is any romantic gay interactions in general
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
That's not how gender works anymore actually. We define gender as the social construct as it relates to biology. In that definition, the bible actually supports trans people because they have allowed women to take traditionally masculine roles in temples as prophetesses and enuchs.

As for being gay, the bible only explicitly forbids Male gay relationships which is more likely related to the fact that is is a sin for Jewish men to "waste their seed". So men weren't permitted anal even in heterosexual contexts. The bible never forbids gay men doing other sexual acts that do not have to do with ejaculation.
1 up, 3mo,
3 replies
I don't care how woke people define gender, gender is not a social concept, it is a biological difference between 2 sides of humanity. Male and female is not social, it is purely biological (which may affect social actions). Every cell in one's body determines weither any animal or human is ma,e or female, you are entirely made of the very evidence that proves your gender. Your gender is in the building blocks of your body. There is NO reasonable evidence that proves one human can entirely switch genders, they can merely pretend to be a different gender. And everyone else is supposed to play along by changing the definition of gender to a social standard, even though it clearly isn't and hasn't been since the beginning of creation.

If God burns down a city for Sodomy, and only gay sexual acts are not allowed, then maybe ur right. But, gay sexual acts are not actually possible, therefore the only thing that really happens is any "romantic" stuff. And if God burned down a city for only romantic actions, then therefore romantic actions aren't allowed. And all gay stuff can follow from this, and therefore, the only logical explanation is that gay is sin.

"Waisting your seed" was mostly meant about straight interactions, not Gay interactions. Sure, maybe God also meant to not waste it as in not wasting it AT ALL, but that action could be repeated alone, and that wouldn't be sodomy, the reason God burned down the 2 cities. (This is getting very descriptive, I am trying my best to be suddle.)

Let's recap:
1. Sodomy is either sexual gay interactions or any romantic gay actions.
2. Sodemy is NOT due to sexual gay interactions (because it is impossible).
3. Therefore, Sodemy is any romantic gay interactions in general.
1 up, 3mo
Now stop twisting the words of the Bible and get some common sense.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
That's the tough thing. It all comes down to linguistics. We're just using different definitions for sex vs. gender. Which, I don't want to burst your bubble (large scientific rant ahead), but the only thing you can't change naturally is your fertility as egg creator or sperm creator. There is a condition where the Y chromosome activates during puberty instead of in the womb. There's also conditions where the Y chromosome doesn't activate at all and results in an otherwise biologically female person who can procreate.

WHAT THIS MEANS IN REGARDS FOR THE DEFINITION OF TRANSGENDER:
The definition of transgender is a person who identifies as a gender that does not correlate to the biological sex assigned to them at birth in regards to the legal system. This means that some trans ppl would be considered cisgender by your definition of trans. (a person pretending to be a different biological sex)

WHAT THIS MEANS IN REGARDS TO CHRISTIANITY:
Given the assumption that God specifically wanted intersex people on this earth, we can assume he wants biological sex to be defined one of two ways. option one is he defines biological males as men able to produce viable sperm and females as women able to produce viable eggs. Meaning everyone who doesn't fall under that spectrum would be considered a third gender. This again checks out with the bible also supporting Eunuchs. Ppl who willingly castrate themselves to become closer to God.

Option Two: God doesn't want us to know what impact biological sex has on religion.

MORE ON GENDER AS PERTAINING TO LINGUISTICS:
From what I can tell, your definition of transgender is closer to the outdated label of trans-sexual (which is considered a slur now usually) This label is rarely used but was pre-dominantly used in the 80's. The idea of gender now is used as an umbrella term for everyone to use arbitrarily as they see fit. Some ppl use it to describe the Mestizo and two spirit roles in indigenous religions. Some ppl use it to be funny and have fun. For example: Xenogenders. There's no requirement for identifying as a gender besides being respectful of closed religions. (religions with rules about who can participate like Judaism)

THE LINGUISTICS OF SODOMY:
The orgin of the word Sodomy comes directly from the bible and wasn't in the original Hebrew because it's like saying Texomy to refer to ppl using guns. Sodom wasn't just punished for "spilling seed" but primarily the issue was they were raping ppl.
0 ups, 3mo,
4 replies
No, male and female are determined in the DNA of the child since it's creation. The gender of a human is not decided by their ability to reproduce. It is in their very DNA! I have stated that there is ONLY 2 genders and being Gay is sin. Sodomy by definition is Gay interactions. Look it up. And I have no idea how this changes my argument at all.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
That's not actually the determining factor of a person's biological sex. It's also contingent on the mother producing the correct hormones correlating with the activation of the y protein.

But I don't think "he made us male and female" could be wrong, I just don't think he gave us the tools to determine who's male and who's female.
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
And how do hormones have to do with your gender? It is important, but it isn't the deciding factor in one's gender.
0 ups, 3mo,
5 replies
Because everyone develops a uterus and va**na in utero. Without testosterone, they develop naturally as a fertile female. All the y protein does is tell the body to secrete testosterone. Which if there's testosterone from sources besides the protein, you can partially develop as male.

The y protein doesn't activate 100% of the time either.
0 ups, 3mo,
3 replies
And yet again, they still have xy chromosomes.
0 ups, 3mo
Yeah. XY chromosomes can result in fertile females or fertile males.
0 ups, 3mo
YY chromosomes can only result in fertile female and infertile intersex ppl with a p**is and uterus.
0 ups, 3mo
You need at least one X chromosome just to exist.
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
No, XY chromosomes mean male and XX chromosomes mean female.
0 ups, 3mo
That's a valid way to define biological sex, but that does mean that Some males can naturally get pregnant, birth children naturally, and look indistinguishable from females down to their internal organs.
0 ups, 3mo
Actually I just remembered there's XXY and XXX chromosomes so you'd have to incorporate those into the binary. I think you could do that by saying presence of a Y chromosome would denote the male and vice versa the female.
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Then my point stands. No matter how people can hack the human body these days, male stays male and female stays female.
0 ups, 3mo
What if you uploaded urself into a mechanical body
0 ups, 3mo
Depending on how you define it absolutely.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Then yes, the robot body could be made a different gender. A soul doesn't have a gender, it is just a person.
0 ups, 3mo
Which is interesting because that would make all spirits without a body non-binary.
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Those are just bodyparts, it doesn't change the y and x chromosomes on their DNA. They still are biologically male or female since birth, weither their reproductive organs work or not.
0 ups, 3mo
*in
0 ups, 3mo
No. It determines the entire reproductive system. That's why ppl with XY chromosomes can naturally get pregnant.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
This is why HRT is easier for ftm (female to male) when you take testosterone, you end up growing your clit into a pseudo p**is that can easily get up to 4in long when erect.

MTF hrt is a long more complicated because you're trying to reverse the male puberty.
0 ups, 3mo
They are just growing body parts, their gender is in their DNA.
0 ups, 3mo
What about intersex people?
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Being gay is not a sin and it has been proven by theologists. The Leviticus verse was mistranslated.
0 ups, 3mo
And how does this affect my argument?
0 ups, 3mo
It says in other parts of the Bible that it’s sinful
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Is being gay is a sin imma just go hang myself real quick since that’s what god wants
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Am I wrong? Which premis is invalid?
0 ups, 3mo
*premis of my argument
0 ups, 3mo
Ur not wrong
0 ups, 3mo
If*
0 ups, 3mo
SUMMARY:
We don't disagree we're just using different definitions in general. Which is ok. There's so many gay and trans ppl who all do things in a plethora of ways so some could be considered to not be sinning even according to your definitions.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Ppl literal get circumsized
1 up, 3mo
Yes
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator