"People are justifiably angry that Facebook, Twitter, Google, and almost all of mainstream media censored the Hunter Biden laptop story, using the bullshit “possible Russian disinformation” and “can’t be verified” claims, and we now know the story to be true, but even if the story had turned out to be completely fake, compare it to Trump coverage of the last 9 years. Over that time can you think of ONE SINGLE F-ING ANTI-TRUMP STORY that was ever censored, buried, or held for verification? Anonymous sources, unverified rumors, overheard conversations, triple levels of hearsay from fired employees, out-of-context & altered quotes, and on and on. It NEVER, NEVER matters when it comes to running a Trump hit piece. Pretty much 365 days a year over 9 years, you can find at least one Trump hit story in mainstream media, which are then forwarded and repeated endlessly until they become fact in the minds of the Left.
But a significant Biden corruption story that could possible affect the election of their selected candidate? Oh suddenly, they have to pretend they’re journalists. 🙄
I’m not saying anti-Trump stories should be censored any more than anti-Biden ones. Free speech & press allows people to tell their stories and speak their minds. It then allows others to confirm or refute the story. More communication means the truth eventually comes out. It also lets us know what sources aren’t credible and shouldn’t be trusted in the future.
Polls show if the Hunter laptop story wasn’t censored, Biden voters would have flipped enough to give Trump the presidency. American mainstream media are never about spreading the truth, though. They’re only goal is to create a shielded, scripted world that produces the outcomes demanded by their Ruling Class masters. It’s yet another reason why you can’t hate these people enough."