First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist.

Just wait until you find out buffalo wings don't come from actual buffalo.

The Nazi party weren't socialists though - the name was a misnomer as they were fascists, a right-wing authoritarian ideology.

Fascism and socialism both have the central tenet of central control. They are, effectively, two sides of the same coin.

What you're attempting to articulate is that they're both authoritarian in nature, which is incorrect.

Socialism, like capitalism, is an economic system that encompasses a diverse range of political ideologies.

Fascism is right-wing authoritarianism in the same way Marxism is left-wing authoritarianism - the problem is there are few if any of the latter at the national level, while one of our two major political parties has been infested by the former.

Central planning, which socialism requires, is authoritarian in nature.

Socialism doesn't require central planning, it require social ownership.

Anarchists and libertarian socialists have criticized the idea of the using the state to conduct central planning or allowing it to own the means of production since the 19th century.

Central ownership can only be brought about by confiscation of property, which always requires a dictatorship and a general curtailing of liberty in general. Libertarians aren’t socialists as they want 100% free markets and limited interference from “central ownership.”

Not central ownership, social ownership.

You're making the same mistake - libertarians exist across the full spectrum of fiscal ideologies.

Everything in the red circle below are libertarians - those on the left are socialist libertarians, those on the right are the corporatists. In either case, none of them want 100% free markets - they all agree that the power of government can and should be used to provide protection of private property, which is why they aren't anarchists.

It’s not Republicans making assaults and calling for Jews to be killed.

I'm sure that response sounded rational in your head - but let's not pretend you aren't cheering on the genocide they're committing against the Palestinians or that your own orange god committed against refugees from South America by taking their children and deporting them back to be killed.

You mean the genocide that Palestinians would make? Or is Israel defending themselves against fighters who hide in civilian areas somehow “genocide”? Also there is no genocide taking place in SA. Just criminals looking to come here to commit crimes.

No - I'm talking about the genocide the right-wing government of Israel is committing right now.

They've killed nearly 40,000 Palestinians - mostly women and children, not enemy combatants, in indiscriminate bombings - since October 7th, while around 1500 Israelis have lost their lives during the same period.

The genocide against South American refugees happened here when Trump separated children from their parents, keeping no records whatsoever of who they belonged to, and deported their parents.

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

* Killing members of the group;
* Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
* Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
* Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
* Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml