.

No im not

A furry femboy modeled after the Boykisser.

Moses, get the boat

Erm, it's actually Noah

OK,
Noah, get the boat

𝐼𝓉 𝒾𝓈 𝒻𝓊𝓃 𝑔𝑒𝓉𝓉𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝓉𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝑒 𝓎𝑜𝓊 𝒽𝒶𝓉𝑒 𝓈𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝐼 𝑜𝓃𝒸𝑒 𝒽𝒶𝓉𝑒𝒹. 𝒴𝑜𝓊 𝓈𝑒𝑒, 𝐼 𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒𝒹 𝓉𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝑒 𝐼 𝒹𝒾𝒹𝓃'𝓉 𝒽𝒶𝓋𝑒 𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓈𝑜𝓃 𝓉𝑜 𝒽𝒶𝓉𝑒 𝒻𝓊𝓇𝓇𝒾𝑒𝓈 𝒶𝓃𝓎𝓂𝑜𝓇𝑒. 𝒲𝒽𝒶𝓉'𝓈 𝓎𝑜𝓊𝓇𝓈, 𝒶𝑔𝒶𝒾𝓃?

-Manipulation of minors
-Corn addiction
-Normalizing wierd fetishes.
-Pedos
-Zoos
-Pokephiles
-The ''good furries'' ignoring the dark side of their fandom and refusing to do call them out.
-Starting flame wars with anti furries for no reason and demonizing them
-Mediocre tiktoks

Those are my reasons

Don’t forget about thinking pineapples are a valid fruit that’s there greatest sin

Indeed

Le thank

Yep

Which is why am the owner of the AFS

And what am I supposed to do about those things? Hell, your fandom has literal terrorists! Fix that too, please!

''Hell, your fandom has literal terrorists!''

No it doesnt. It has bad apples and bullies true, but terrorists only form a minority.

And besides I never thought you would make such an accusiation. Usually its the furries who make exxagerated accusiations. But you, an ally of the afs??? Why??

Because you listed things that apply to the part of the fandom everyone hates. The part I am no member of and will continue to work against. On your side. Just like you voiced concerns about me joining the dark side of the fandom (which I have not), I expressed how there is a bad part of your community too. That is why. I was always one to talk on a reasonable level, yet I left the Anti-Furries because they can be extremely gruesome at times. Which I am regularly reminded of when approving memes in the anti_furry_society stream.

Anti furry humor in many cases is dark humor, hence why I can be gruesome. Though am not gonna lie it can get repetitive, which is why me and others are working to help antis make more original and better quality memes. But what am conerned about is the fact that you posted furry boykisser femboy memes and claimed to be a therian.

I'm guessing they were anti furries if it was specifically a furry con

It could have been anyone, but for some reason you are hyperfixiated on believing that it was anti furries without enough proof.

Actually.

In the past decade, there have been 2+ attacks on furries from your kind.

That's 2+ too many!

Attacks? Yes

But from anti furries, thats still unkown

The identities of the attackers have not yet been found

I'm guessing you got that from Facebook :)

No, I got it from all sources possible.

Sure.

All you're doing is focusing on negativity.

That's why you're an anti furry.

You're acting like that's all the Fandom is.

But humans in general are awful, and have the similar categories.
Criminals,
pedophiles,
racists,
and shitty people,
etc..

So stop acting like this is exclusive to furries.

A. Am not an anti furry, am just allied with them.
B. Correct, anti furries generally focus on the bad side of the fandom. The reason being that the normal ones dont do anything to call out and stop the bad side.
C. I know that not all of the fandom is bad, but the dark side cannot be ignored and needs to be called out.
D. Yes humans do all those things. But the difference between normal humans and toxic furries is that while normal humans get called out all the time toxic furries rarely get the same ostracizing and call outs.

And I never said this is exclusive to furries, but its clearly obvious that barely anyone is doing anything to call them out. Which is why the anti furry movement exists.

The dark side. Pedophiles, zoophiles, weirdos, furry porn, etc.

Yes, there are always dark parts of a certain fandom.
I might remind you that your folks have gassed conventions before.

''I might remind you that your folks have gassed conventions before.''

There is no evidence to confirm that. While gas attacks have happened at conventions the identity of the attackers has noit been found. And they are unlikely to be anti furries given that most anti furries would never go to a furry convention for obvious reasons.

Let the legend cook now

THEY MUST HAVE BEEN ANTIS IF THEY SPECIFICALLY ATTACK FURRIES!!!

Nah they were just republicans

Thanks

@Memesoon201 that deserves an upvote.

He will

Or it could just be terrorists.

There's a lot of evidence.

MANY SOURCES.

For example,

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://slate.com/podcasts/icymi/2024/06/midwest-furfest-2014-chemical-attack-explained&ved=2ahUKEwjXt5eX6ZOHAxV_jIkEHcqWDZQQxfQBKAB6BAgOEAI&usg=AOvVaw1d66g4bwLNo5wOE2GGzl1L

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/07/furries-convention-chlorine-gas-sickens-19-people&ved=2ahUKEwjXt5eX6ZOHAxV_jIkEHcqWDZQQyM8BKAB6BAgLEAI&usg=AOvVaw3zHogG49a1ERcv992rNiGc

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/12/07/369186497/chlorine-gas-leak-in-chicago-disrupts-furries-convention&ved=2ahUKEwjXt5eX6ZOHAxV_jIkEHcqWDZQQxfQBKAB6BAgQEAI&usg=AOvVaw2AKIKDkl_tUFyRq-iXDInU

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/intentional-chemical-leak-at-hyatt-regency/122186/%3Famp%3D1&ved=2ahUKEwjXt5eX6ZOHAxV_jIkEHcqWDZQQyM8BKAB6BAgNEAI&usg=AOvVaw2nfeRdQOp-MxAOczegYGMN

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/chemical-attack-chicago-midwest-furfest/%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwjXt5eX6ZOHAxV_jIkEHcqWDZQQyM8BKAB6BAgHEAI&usg=AOvVaw3tZiRjyQcvYLypJDaoOH5shttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/furfest-2014-thousands-in-furry-costumes-forced-to-evacuate-hotel-after-intentional-chlorine-gas-plot-9910718.html&ved=2ahUKEwjXt5eX6ZOHAxV_jIkEHcqWDZQQxfQBKAB6BAgGEAI&usg=AOvVaw0DX8vBWMVuGc0a91NNiDQw

So don't try and tell me it's fake, jackass.

F**k off.

Oh my god, your misintepretating what I said.

I never said that the attacks where fake, I said that we dont know the identities of the attackers and that most likely they wherent anti furries because as stated most anti furries would never go to a furry convention.

For the record most likely there are some anti furries who celebrated the attacks (the antis of the AFS do not condone that). However the attackers are still unlikely to be antis because again what would an anti furry be doing at a furry convention.

And this bullshit is why you're blocked.

Sorry, I ain't got time for petty f**kers like you.

Bruh all I did was saying that it was flawed to assume that the gas attackers where anti furries without proper evidence.

It’s called an assumption.

*Noah

Be careful of land sharks :3

wrong guy

Soz