Fauci laughs at the suckers

Fake news vaccine saved lives not ended them.

Posted the studies over 50 times on here you’ve gotten like 1/3 of those.

At this point it’s just denial.

You are delusional

Nope just tired of antivax bs. Your memes are delusional.

No, they are not delusional. You're in a cult of Pharmaceutical junkies. so you don't see your own delusion's.

I make and repair medical equipment.
Science and facts don’t care about made up conspiracies that this was all somehow to exert more control over the population or kill them with zero evidence to back it up. Other then tweets and known prolific liars and a man who couldn’t run a casino much less understand how
Viruses work.

sure ... that's why they had to silence medical professionals that had a different take... that was contrary to Big Pharma...

To prevent people from taking fish pills and dying thinking it was a panacea.

Or that an anti parasite drug that poisons parasites effected something that technically doesn’t meet the definition of life.

Are you talking about Anthony Fauci?

No im talking about that orange pillock who thinks windmills cause cancer and suggested injecting disinfectant.

Get informed

https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1805241369033650255

Ffs a tweet is not a valid form of citation…

The link has the journalist report by Herridge.

it's there goto argument... even though tweets contain factual information

Wrong! The truth was finally ALLOWED to be published.

https://www.wnd.com/2024/06/explosive-study-removed-lancet-now-public-74-deaths-directly-tied-covid-jab/

It’s called excess deaths. The stats are undeniable.

More states are following Kansas and are going to sue Pfizer...

Sigh…first off
WND is an opinion editorial “paper” with an extreme right wing bias. They became famous/infamous because of they backed the brother conspiracy around Obama. (So not much credibility there.). They have polls such as “should we allow the radical left to replace Independence Day with junteenth.”

So yeah not exactly an unbiased source.

So let’s look at the paper and oh boy is it a Gordian knot of spelling errors, grammatical errors, loaded statements, unverified data, and it’s not even directly collected data but rather data collected through other studies that they picked from. It’s not even a faulty omnibus paper like the one from 2020 it’s just saying they added a bunch of deaths from the studies and don’t even go into detail about each study they pulled from.

What does this translate too? They took a bunch of dead 70.4 year olds who died during other studies and added them up then incorrectly claimed roughly 75% of all covid deaths were caused by the vaccine which even under their own cherry picked data and criteria …that’s not been proven. Even if you took their data at face value that number only applies to critically ill 70 year olds across 44 studies NOT every covid death for EVERY age group.

This also is ignoring the fact that they pulled much of their data from VAERS which accepts any and all reports regardless of true or completely outlandish. You could report to Vaers that the flu shot turned you into a big footed purple dinosaur and it the reporting system would HAVE to accept it. Even inspection 2.2 they list how they did not include any studies with unvaccinated patients.and 2.3 any “data discrepancies” were “discussed and filtered out.” Uh yeah that’s not a scientific method of exclusion you can’t just talk amongst yourself”bed and say “we figured it out trust us bro”. The bare minimum would be “we noticed this data set suggested x however giving repeat testing in y,z and q we believe this to be a discrepancy.”

Peer reviewed, published in Lancet.

FACT

“Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.”

“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

Lancet removed the study themselves because they literally said their conclusion doesn’t add up from their methods.

Which after reading it myself I whole heartedly agree with that assessment.

And when they say it’s peer reviewed they mean amongst the other authors of the paper which is not what peer reviewed means.

The report is now back on the Lancet.

Of course they never want to admit they were wrong...