If theological debate could be settled via craftily explicated statement of opinion, it would have ceased to be a matter of contention millenia ago.
The long explanation is strewn around the atheist stream, but I too get the feeling you don't care either way.
If proof was relevant to the proceedings, the subject wouldn't be a matter of faith. Because the direct is a matter of faith, it is beyond the scope of science to meaningfully address. People can prove that they believe something, and they can misuse language by claiming they *know* their belief to be objectively true, but it's got nothing to do with rational thought. That puts it out of my purview, so there's nothing to do but say "god bless" and go back to weeping inwardly that Homo Sapiens is unworthy of its namesake. 🤷
