Imgflip Logo Icon
That's not normal. Proved with cited sources. | Porn addicted furries, Normal furries, Zoophile, and porn addicted furries | image tagged in charts,pie charts | made w/ Imgflip chart maker
136 views 6 upvotes Made by F-35B_Lightning_II 1 week ago in anti-furr_vs_furr
60 Comments
0 ups, 4d
Lmao the only furries I know are casual but crazy religious homophobic therians and also a very asexual pure soul furry
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
I bet someone will comment Nuh uh
0 ups, 1w,
3 replies
Nuh uh
0 ups, 1w
Wait
0 ups, 1w
You’ve Nuh uh’d your own post
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Therefore you are saying your own post is false
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Nuh uh
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Yuh huh
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
I said nuh uh to your nuh uh comment. A negative times a negative is still positive.
0 ups, 1w
You have no idea how much you just blew mind
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Normal furrys are even smaller than that. From a survey it was 5% that don’t watch porn
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
That was men;
Men: 96.3%
Women: 78.3%

The average of both of those is 87.3%

Taking into consideration that all zoophiles watch porn; that still means that 12.7% of furries are normal.
0 ups, 2d
Thats still a lot of furries addicted to furry corn
0 ups, 7d,
1 reply
You put porn addicted furries in two different categories in the same chart, just to let you know
0 ups, 7d,
1 reply
Yes, because all zoo furries watch porn which fits them into the same category, but also gives an extremely bad trait.
0 ups, 6d,
2 replies
I get that but I still don’t get why you put them in separate categories on the same chart lol
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Because it shows that 85% of furries are porn addicted, AND 14% of furries are zoophiles.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Here’s your problem, you think anyone that’s porn addicted or involved in it in any way are immediately zoophiles
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
What are you smoking?? I am saying that porn addictions T U R N I N T O zoophilia.

Also, did I say that 85% of furries are zoophiles? Cause I don't remember saying that.
0 ups, 6d,
2 replies
I didn’t say that you assumed 85% of furries are zoophiles, I’m saying that your assuming that anything sexual related people are involved with that involves furries immediately means they are more likely going to be attracted to kids/pets
0 ups, 6d
Please stop using the word immediately, because...

I'VE SAID IT BEFOR-- I'm not gonna say it again. You know... you know.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Also, get on discord; we're running out of space LMFAOOO
0 ups, 6d
lol ok
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Also, if I were to put them in separate categories; it would show as 1% of furries are normal which you wouldn't want anyways sooooo...
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
If I’m going to be honest with you, furries aren’t normal, but that doesn’t mean that they aren’t a innocent group that have no intentions in bothering anyone, look I get it, there’s furries out there that are actually weirdos, and I don’t encourage those kind, and neither do other furries

Just to keep in mind, some “chill” furries might have an addiction themselves or even draw nsfw themselves and you wouldn’t know about it
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
The furries with porn addictions are an innocent group; until they aren't. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Porn addictions turn into zoophilia & pedophilia.
0 ups, 6d
So you’re just going to judge people based on your assumption of what they are going to turn into instead of what they are now? If so that’s just plain out ridiculous :/

Also Philla means attraction to things, so some addiction doesn’t mean someone is going to encourage someone to be attracted to kids or a dog or whatever, I’m not saying that you’re wrong, but that doesn’t mean that it was made specifically to turn people into rapists or immediately have attraction to things that isn’t right

If that were the case, furry porn would’ve been illegal a long time ago
0 ups, 7d,
1 reply
Sure
0 ups, 7d,
1 reply
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
If you’re a so called “F35” pilot don’t you have other important matters to attend to instead of picking on people with petty harmless addictions?
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Harmless as in... starting out as small, but growing into zoophilia/pedophilia which in turn makes the furry fandom get clowned on more than they already are? Causing physical, and mental lash outs; along with causing depression, and other mental health issues in furries???

I would shut up, and allow the chill anti-furries to do their job if I were you.
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
I can answer all of those, For one, it’s out there, but Not everyone who has a addiction is going to be some idiot who likes minors or f**k their pets, because some actually have common sense and already know about those things and ain't some sicko who would try to do these types of things, Second of all, love and care comes first before reputation, as in don’t assume the worst throughout popularity, but by if it’s actually truly bad or not, physical and mental lashouts just show that they can’t handle the mental stability like some people but that doesn’t make them a bad person, as a matter of fact, some of them are more mentally stable then any of us

Chill anti furry my ass, You write like 5 paragraphs trying to prove that someone is immediately a rapist just because they play with themselves while watching animations or art and that everyone that draws it are jerks to everyone and try to encourage it, get tf outa here dude, I don’t think that you’re a bad person, but you need better understanding that not everyone who is involved in “fetish” or whatever is immediately a horrible person and that it’s more of some kind of threat then WW3 about to break out, like if you’re actually some kind of F35 pilot don’t you have some spy balloon you need to shoot down instead of treating some only fans like it’s an avenger level threat?
0 ups, 6d,
1 reply
Common sense doesn't apply to a general addiction. A person with common sense will only last LONGER than the people who don't have common sense. In the end however; the addiction will always win. Addictions is one of the most powerful forces on earth: it can turn humans mad, the world insane, and an entire group violent.

That's kind of ironic considering that if an anti-furry lashed out physically/mentally you would call them a crybaby, or an anarchist/Nazi.

If you would like to see what a non-chill anti-furry looks like; I can do that. Only in discord though, because I would get instantly banned in this stream for being a non-chill anti-furry.

I'VE SAID IT BEFORE, AND I'LL SAY IT OVER AND OVER A F**KING GAIN! Porn addictions does not instantly make you a rapist. It T U R N S you into one over a long period of time.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again; porn addictions don't instantly make you a bad person. It turns you into one.

I'm not an F-35 pilot LMFAOOO I just like the aircraft so I named myself F-35B Lightning II.
0 ups, 6d
Bro I was joking about the F35 part XD
0 ups, 1w
ATTENTION: When I made this chart; I started looking for a problem because I couldn't believe that only 12.7% of furries were normal.

So before you call me a liar, if I really was lying there would be higher numbers for normal furries 🤣🤣
0 ups, 1w,
2 replies
Age range ?
0 ups, 1w
Anyway, I'm hella bad to find stats especially on subjects like that, but I think it'd be interesting to compare it to a neutral sample.
Same age range, and about the same location.
Idk your sources so if you already have something like that already let me know.
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
They didn't collect an age range. Although I think the average furry is like 25 years old or something.
0 ups, 1w,
2 replies
What sources did you use?
0 ups, 1w,
2 replies
Many... Here you go.

ZOOPHILIA:

Sociology of Furry Fandom (Rust, J. D., 2001) 2% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20050302094251/http://www.visi.com/%7Ephantos/furrysoc.html

Furry Sociological Survey (Evans, K., 2008) 17% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/2008-evans.pdf

2008 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2008) 18.4% of respondents stated they were zoophiles. https://web.archive.org/web/20090224123642/https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2008.php

2009 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2009) 13.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20101123064940/https://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2009.php

2010 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2010) 13.6% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110225222046/https://klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2010.php

2011 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2011) 13.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221006214822/http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey2011.php

2012 Furry Survey (Osaki, A., 2012) 14.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130312072042/https://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php

2019 Studies (Roberts, S., et al., 2019) 6.9% of respondents stated they were zoophiles. https://furscience.com/research-findings/appendix-1-previous-research/furscience-2019/

Male Furries (Hsu, K., Bailey, J. M., 2019) 46.7% of respondents stated that they have sexual attraction to real animals.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/2019-hsu.pdf

What Are Furries? (fek, 2020) 14.3% of respondents stated they were zoophiles.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210116160156/https://whatarefurries.com/
0 ups, 1w,
2 replies
You could have just used WIKIPEDIA
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Those articles probably would have been made by furries which greatly underwhelm the situation & stats.
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Exactly invalid biased evidence is the best evidence
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Okay... 99% of furries are zoophiles.

Is that valid in an argument.
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Yes
0 ups, 1w,
2 replies
Shit, you commented this on exactly 00:00 which means you are valid.
0 ups, 1w
Huh?
0 ups, 1w
No no no no no wait wait wait, wait wait wait wait
0 ups, 1w,
2 replies
Or sorry I use military time.

You commented that on exactly midnight my time.
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Also shouldn’t you go to sleep
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Sleep is for the strong. I'm weak.
0 ups, 1w
Lol
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Mountain time zone?
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
Yes, I live around the 40° N area.
0 ups, 7d,
1 reply
Utah, Idaho, Colorado, or Wyoming?
0 ups, 7d,
1 reply
Yep; one of those.
0 ups, 7d
Imma say Colorado since it’s the most populated of them all
0 ups, 1w
47%. Wow.
0 ups, 1w,
1 reply
PORN ADDICTION:

331 out of 334 male furries in a survey stated they had some sexual motivation for being furries.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-018-1303-7

564,127 submissions were labeled as SFW on Furaffinity, which is a little below half as small as the 1,180,293 submissions labeled as NSFW. As well as 751,589 submissions labeled as Vore on Furaffinity. Nearly 200,000 more than what is labeled as SFW.
https://www.furaffinity.net/search/?q=sfw
https://www.furaffinity.net/search/?q=nsfw
https://www.furaffinity.net/search/?q=vore

Another states that 87.3% view exotic furry art, or if we factor in the fandom’s ratio of males to females, instead of a 50/50 split, our percentage changes to 92.25%.
https://furscience.com/research-findings/demographics/1-3-sex-and-gender/
https://furscience.com/research-findings/appendix-1-previous-research/furry-fiesta-2013/
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sjzsn7BaqFZNk1z2MzRf8HMGT1cNpH6misIfX5h6dro/edit?usp=sharing
0 ups, 1w
Alright, thanks! I use some of these sources myself sometimes.
Created with the Imgflip Chart Maker
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
That's not normal. Proved with cited sources. | Porn addicted furries, Normal furries, Zoophile, and porn addicted furries