Imgflip Logo Icon

.

. | y'all are so corny 😭😭; 99% of furries ain't that bad and you guys are treating them like a war crime like DAMN IS IT THAT HARD TO LET SOMEONE BE?? | image tagged in green fn | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
208 views β€’ 10 upvotes β€’ Made by Hyakugojyuuichi 1 month ago in anti_furry_society
Green fn memeCaption this Meme
30 Comments
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I hate on everyone indiscriminately
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
I feel that
1 up, 1mo
Fr
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
wasnt this a study out of about 250 furries
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
That's the point.
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
considering the HIGH amount of furries in the world this could be very inaccurate, lets say that x, the amount of total furries studied, and y, the amount of furries IN THE WORLD.

x = 127.25, considering how 50.9% was found to watch NSFW things.
y = ~200,000,000, which is a rough estimate on how many furries there are in the world, and this is probably a smaller number.

the ratio is x:y, or 127.25:200000000, or 1/25,000

i don't know if my math is correct, but this means that 1 out of ever 25,000 furries watch NSFW things.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I'm sorry, but I can't sugarcoat this. Your math is very, very wrong, and it's not entirely your fault.

First of all, the statistic that you are using is not good. The statistic that you used was not the percentage of furries that watch NSFW things. The statistic is the percentage of furry art that males view that is pornographic, which is not usable to predict the amount of furries that view pornographic content, because it is an average. You were working with data that is not usable for this task, which isn't necessarily your fault.

I found a statistic that will help here. https://furscience.com/research-findings/appendix-1-previous-research/furry-fiesta-2013/ . It's from the same website as the data from the comment above, but this statistic that I'm going to use is from question 11. It is "whether they, themselves, looked at furry pornography." You're really not going to like this.

Males: 96.3% yes
Females: 78.3% yes

That's quite high. It gets worse.

The amount of furries that you suggested was 200 million. I found a range of values from 800K to 2M, which is WAY smaller than 200 million. However, because we're working with percentages, the final result won't be very different.
So first of all, I don't know which ones are males and females. However, under question 2 in that website, "the fandom is predominantly male, with 77.9% of our participants identifying as biologically male, 17.5% identifying as biologically female, and 3.6% identifying as transgender (with 1% identifying as β€œother”)." To find the gender makeup, we multiply the percentage by 200 million to find the male and female values. This means that:

Male furry amount: 155,800,000
Female furry amount: 35,000,000
Transgender furry amount: 7,200,000
Other furry amount: 2,000,000

That seems quite high, but the result won't differ too much in the end. Also, where the heck did you get 200 million furries?

I only got data on male and female porn watching, so I'll drop the transgender and other furry amount. This means that my percentage in the end will be low.

Once again, I'm going to multiply the amount of male/female furries by the percentage of them that view pornographic content. This tells me how many of them view porn.

Males: 155800000 * 96.3% = 150035400.
Females: 35000000 * 78.3% = 27405000
Total male and female: 177440400 furries.

I'm running out of space
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
To get the percentage we divide our previous total by the total amount of furries (allegedly 200 million) to get a decimal, and multiply it by 100 to make it a percentage.

177440400 / 200000000 * 100 = 88.7202% of furries watch pornography. That's pretty high.

For the ratio, in case you want it, it's 88:100, or about 1 in 1.136363636...

Now, I'm not the statistics guru and I'm pretty sure I made a mistake somewhere. But the statistic of furries that watch pornography is awfully high.
0 ups, 1mo
watch this comment get deleted cause this is more accurate than mines
0 ups, 1mo
btw you goated for this πŸ™πŸ™
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
200 million is quite a lot. That's saying that 2.57% of people are furries

Applying your logic, you're saying there is only 8,000 nsfw furries in the world. I don't know about you but I believe that number is drastically higher.
1 up, 1mo
i know, that's why i said that this number is probably inaccurate, and just an estimate
0 ups, 1mo
oh by the way this was a study of 455 furries
3 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
thats not very sigma patrick bateman edit of you..............
2 ups, 1mo
I'm sorry rizz king
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
The ones who "treat them like a war crime" are the flashy, immature ones who refuse to grow up and respect others choice, a lot of us only actively hate on the truly bad ones such as zoos and pedophiles.

(Kind of hard to back that up seeing a lot of the memes on this stream)
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
hey if you look at your "memes" a lot of them don't even specify what types of furry, so basically means every one of them
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
And you didn't say which type of anti-furry treats furries as warcrimes?
[deleted]
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
1 up, 1mo,
2 replies
Yes, however. I clearly stated, "A lot of us only actively hate on bad ones" That meme is an example of a more broad disliking towards furries.
0 ups, 1mo
hes got a point
yet so does saki
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
hey can you like NOT abuse your mod power whenever someone brings up a point
0 ups, 1mo
That wasn't me-
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
It's not that hard, I agree. However, and exist. Both in the same game. Pretty hard to ignore.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
thats just CHANGED
0 ups, 1mo
Indeed it is.
0 ups, 1mo
0 ups, 1mo
0 ups, 1mo
Fr tho
Green fn memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
y'all are so corny 😭😭; 99% of furries ain't that bad and you guys are treating them like a war crime like DAMN IS IT THAT HARD TO LET SOMEONE BE??