Test it- citizens arrest one of those illegals.. and find their un card.

This is also interesting. 1001111101101011

Did the globalist traitor trump get shot or not? Should take you 0.00003s to find the answer..

It sounds like you already have the answer. So what I think or not, is of 00000 value.

Beep boop, classic roboshtick. No, it does matter.. did the globalist traitor trump get shot or not? I want to hear your dedication to the bit.

And another thing, what makes Trump a globalist traitor more than the rest of the political machine? hate on one hate on all of them, if that's your angle. He's no worse than the Kamel-toe, whom I loathe.

Deflect project, americanviking taught u well.

Answer the rebuttal without deflecting.

Pardon me while I get a beer and ponder how to answer you. I don't even owe you an answer you've been nothing but a dick-wad to me so far. But I'll continue to be patient.

I think (believe),

He got shot. Occam's Razor. Which is more likely? He faked his own assassination attempt, and that guy sitting in the audience didn't die (fake), in an attempt to generate sympathy and support with complicit Secret Service and LE,

OR,

his presence in politics is a fly in the ointment for bur-bur-- "Deep State" and globalist powers and the kingmakers wanted Trump out of the race.

The second option is much more believable. Someone in the security detail was paid to turn their head, or left that building out of the secure perimeter. How do you interpret the silence about Mathew Crooks since his death. Or you think that was staged too? Either way it gets deeper. There is silence either because they are suppressing evidence, conducting an investigation, or likely both. Resources of time or information to fact check ad nauseum are limited and contradictory information only clouds the issue.

Clunk screech, u could really hear the cogs whirring on that one, what did it take an hour? Looks like u learnt to lie, pretty soon u'll be a real human (not). Doesn't seem very smart of u to profess he got shot when there was no blood or scar. So deflect with the talking points like a good little schill.
Its true then, that bots like u are all programmed to get people behind dumpf-. Domo arigato mr roboto.

I see.

There was blood, quite enough of it; just because you 'think' there should have been more blood doesn't mean the injury was fake. And scar? Do you have your nose up his ass that you can see a scar on his ear? Talking points, whatever are you talking about? And the person who got shot and died (you say) was staged. And the others that got injured, that was staged. Crooks didn't get shot either, right?

Dude you believe what you want. Tear your guts up over it. It. Matters. Nothing. To. Me.
And it matters zero to the political machine, the 'globalists', etc. what little people like you and I think. It amuses me you waste your time trolling me when you have so much brain and talent you could be putting to better use.

No, the second option is hardly more believable.

Two weeks later there wasn't a scab, a mark, a nick, a scratch, nothing (anyone who's ever shaved would love to know his secret). Just like there was no blood on his hand despite Trump's claim the next day at the rally. Guy gets shot, and all he can think about is getting his shoe back on so he could pose for a picture by a Pulitzer Prize winning photographer who just happened to get at the right position right before the right moment to take a photo of the bullet whizzing by and others mimicking the classic Iwo Jima one.

If someone got paid off, it would have to be all of them, Secret Service and local police, with not a single one of them saying a pip about it. That's a bit shaky. There was no coordination with the local police, and they kept in a dark during preparations for the rally. What happened afterwards they offer a reason as to me why.

Three days of footage of the kid crawling around and doing surveillance, video of him rolling around on the roof and taking position, and nope, raised no suspicions at all.
Sure, makes sense. It says so on my deed to the Brooklyn bridge.

Did it ever occur to you that he wiped his hands on someone's shirt or something before that picture was snapped? How can you tell how clean someone's hands are if the hand is a fist?

Sure, so he staged it, Crooks didn't get shot, didn't die, hell, he wasn't even a real person, and the person behind him who got shot and the others wounded, they must have been paid bigly to be complicit, them and all their family and aquaintances. Just so happens it was caught on camera by someone who could take real pictures aand why wouldn't there be an actual photographer there, from the news), instead of a couple of blurry cell phone cam shots (there were those too, but those wouldn't count either, since anything can be faked. And all the people in the audience, they would have to be paid off. Sorry, no. It came from the top down, not the actual Secret Service on the ground, and the local LE, sorry. They just get paid to follow orders, not think on their own. Cheetos was slovenly and inept, too inept, they let this stooge Crooks close, and if he succeeded, mission accomplished! he would have been a dead man anyways. And she got sacrificed because someone had to wear it. The collusion possible in upper echelon of bureaucracy, especially anything law enforcement, is truly scary. I put nothing past them.

No, that did not occur to me because it did not happen.

I actually just finished making this meme in regards to somebody else's comment elsewhere about watching videos of the January 6th Capitol Hill riot. Videos.

Like him, what you seem to be unaware of is that both these incidents were broadcasted live on television as they happened, and then they had them on repeat well into the next day. Here in America, anyways. We weren't restricted to snippets of it on Tucker Carlson videos on YouTube.

Strawmanning is irrelevant, btw

Assume much, don't you. I happened to be watching the speech live as it unfolded. None of what unfolded looked like it was staged.

Correct, I did assume................. that your words were your words.

Let's have a look, shall we?

"Soul_Roll 1h, 1 reply

Did it ever occur to you that he wiped his hands on someone's shirt or something before that picture was snapped? How can you tell how clean someone's hands are if the hand is a fist?

Sure, so he staged it, Crooks didn't get shot, didn't die, hell, he wasn't even a real person, and the person behind him who got shot and the others wounded, they must have been paid bigly to be complicit, them and all their family and aquaintances. Just so happens it was caught on camera by someone who could take real pictures aand why wouldn't there be an actual photographer there, from the news), instead of a couple of blurry cell phone cam shots (there were those too, but those wouldn't count either, since anything can be faked. And all the people in the audience, they would have to be paid off. Sorry, no. It came from the top down, not the actual Secret Service on the ground, and the local LE, sorry. They just get paid to follow orders, not think on their own. Cheetos was slovenly and inept, too inept, they let this stooge Crooks close, and if he succeeded, mission accomplished! he would have been a dead man anyways. And she got sacrificed because someone had to wear it. The collusion possible in upper echelon of bureaucracy, especially anything law enforcement, is truly scary. I put nothing past them."

So what is your point here. We both could have seen the same thing at the same time as it happened, and come to completely different conclusions.

Waiting for your "gotcha".

No, that is not my point.
You did not see the same thing and come to a completely different conclusion, as your alternate reality version wasn't there to be seen at all.

I begin to see why the OP was giving you a hard time. He's been through this with you before, hasn't he?
I figured as you put a little bit of effort into your comment it warranted something more than a mere dismissal. But now I see I was wrong. There was no effort put into it at all, it was just standard fanfic reposting.

Wait, you're the one with the Colonial Era was good revisionism on another meme earlier?

Lesson learned, egg on my face, I'm bored,,,

Yes, he has the tin-foil theory about "the event at Trump's speech" going on like you do.

Looks like u've been going back through all my memes..

Copy cat.