It sounds like an open-and-shut case to me...
“There is no DNA evidence in this case, and none will be introduced at trial,” Carroll's lawyer Kaplan wrote.
Her client instead “has amassed powerful proof that Trump sexually assaulted her” without the sample, Kaplan said.
The lawyer said a report by an expert showed there was unidentified male DNA present on the dress Carroll wore when she encountered Trump, but she said it was not an isolated sample of male DNA but rather a mix of DNA that would require complex analysis if the judge permitted the issue to be reopened prior to trial. Never mind that they also refused to release their testing to Trump's legal team...
So the dress she claims she was wearing that has DNA evidence... was not for sale until YEARS after the alleged crime... on top of which her lawyer is on the record saying there is NO DNA evidence... and the cherry on the top... there's a mix of DNA on her dress... OMG
Also remember the crooked judge would not allow the jury to hear any of this...