If you see LordZerostrike98 say i'm a zoophile, he's lying. Characters like Loona are sapient with human feelings

Blitzo was right. Loona's fanboys are awful. But again its Viv's fault for sexualizing many of her female animal characters.

Bruh refuses to control his gross fetishes and now is defending mating woth biologically different species 💀💀💀

But well this is Vivzipop's fault for sexualizing her female animal characters. Though Loona is not really that sexualized.

Am not the one whining about fictional characters dying and calling everyone I dont like n$zis.

Based army. Humanity first, xenos last

First he believes that diddling cartoon animals is fine because he cant control his gross fetishes. Now he does not se the difference between monster girls and cartoon animals.

"Human feelings" nothing. Their still animals and a biologically different species. Just keep your gross fetishes to yourself and no one will complain.

Smosh with one of his seggs toys:

Blitzo had a point is episode 3, Loona's fanbase is disgusting.

this includes other kids.

Sapience does not matter. Species does

Put some restrictions tegarding your NSFW amd keep that gross stuff to yourself please.

How did I not recognized the gj argument-

We can perhaps say that Smosh is gjyg 2.0

Way worse than gj by your saying.
Gjyg is (was?) on yiff but is absolutely against zoos.
This mf is going wild with r34 of slightly animal characters

By your saying

Pretty much

Quick check on his profile, like I said, he needs to move on

Yup

Jesus ain't scrolling past the furry NSFW 💀💀

This dude needs help

Do you have to make a meme about our beef??? Really???

This is has nothing to do with sapience, but with the fact that your promoting mating with a hiologically different species and being attracted to animalistic traits and bodies. Get help

Ha, don't worry about LordZeroStrike, he always does that.
I'm on the anti-furr_vs_furr stream with him, I like him, but sometimes he's just unbearable.

About Loona tho... uh...
It's a cartoon character bro...
Like... I mean great but idk how weird you'll push it, so I'll recommend to like and move on.

Dude you dont seem to understand whats going on. This guy is not just attracted, he is into the whole thing and taking things too far. And besides Loona is not that lewded.

I mean, he's not the first simping for an anime character, but calling him a zoo ain't gonna help buddy

I never called him a zoo. And Loona is not even an anime character. Besides she has a human disguise, why would he choose to lewd her regular wolf form instead of her human disguise???

She... has a human form ?

Wlel its actually a disguise. Point is, if she has a human disguise why doesnt he lewd her in that instead kf her regular wolf form??? This is what happens when a person becomes too addicted to yiff.

I'm attracted to human women too, kid.

If you where you woudnt be trying to justify cartoon bestiality and z00philic fetishes. And I woundt be suprised if you also defended consensual incest too as only an inbred person would believe that 2 biologically different species should be allowed to mate. Its one thing to have furry fetishes but this is taking things too far.

All i did was posting a Harkness test in the comments, i never said i support beastiality (the test doesn't support it too.). Plus i don't post about human women that often because those posts i made were in the Furries-Stream.

No, Twi Lek and Asari are human-like creatures. Human-like creatures dont count. If it was something like Stitch from Lilo and Stitch or the Hanar then it would be bestiality.

Bruh the Harkness Test defends people making out with talking animals and creatures, which is still z00philia. By its own logic it also defends feral p0rn, beast fetishism and beast romanticism. If you kept your gross fetishes to yourself no one would be mad at you. But no, horny furries bring ultra horny as usual.

So you're saying that spending the night with Twi'lek or Asari is still beastiality despite them not having any animal features?

Dudrle he likes it for the fact that she is an animal. And he is also defending pokemon r34. He is not attracted to the human part (besides Loona is not even that seccualized), he likes them for being animals and wants to defend stuff like the Shape of Water. And arent you suppose to be on our side???

I'm not an anti no-
Wait he defend pokemon r34 ???!

Yup, and wants people to mate with cartoon animals. He is not "attracted" to the human part. He is attracted to the animal part and wants to defend people unironically mating with cartoon animals in a Shape of Water-esque way.

If what you said is true then it's wayy worst that I imagined ngl

Yup

Also i never called him a zoo. I called him out for defending pokemon r34 and people mating with cartoon animals. Its one thing to have a cartoon crush but he took it too far.

I was talking about this garchomp in imgflip.com/i/8cyz9w

Cosplay ?

Thats not an anthropomorphic Garchomp. Thats a Garchomp monster girl. Monster girls are human-like creatures with animal traits. An anthro Garchomp would be a Garchomp with a humanesque physique.

Also thats not what i meant with pokemon. Am talking about unironically diddling pokemon and feral p0rn of pokemon.

It's an anthropomorphic version of garchomp by Dangoheart Animation. But i don't find pokemon like Vaporeon in their game form attractive

Dude thats not an anthro Garchomp. Thats a Garchomp monster girl. Monster girls are human-like creatures with animal traits. An anthro Garchomp would be a Garchomp with a humanesque physique.

Thanks for correcting me

And I would appreciate if you apologized for believing in that test and for defending cartoon bestiality. Its one thing to have a furry fetish but what your saying is tkaing things too far.

Thats not a Garchomp. Thats a garchomp monster girl. Monster girls=/=anthropomorphic animals/creatures.