98.6 degrees F is an average human body temperature. It does not mean that is the exact temperature you will be. But if you take a sample of 100 people and graph it out within a normal distribution, the majority will fall within 1 standard distribution of that mean. However, you do not say a person with a 104 temperature is fighting metabolic change. The goal is to reduce the temp back to a "normal range" correct? So what is the normal temp for a dynamic Earth?
The Cretaceous lasted 80 million years. Temps, CO2 levels and O2 levels were much higher than today. Is that the correct or incorrect temps we want? Maybe the Permian temps were the correct temps? That period only lasted 50 million years and saw ocean temps of 100 degrees and air temps hitting the 160s. Maybe we're shooting for the 300 years of cold that started in the 1500s? But that was either a solar output blip or volcanic activity. How about the temps of the Ice Age? But it only lasted 2 million years. How about the temps of the Hadean? That lasted roughly 500 million years, though temps were hundreds of degrees hotter than today. So what IS the correct, Democrat approved, green energy necessary, temperature supposed to be today when the planet has literally gone from ocreans hotter than your oven's max setting to glaciers in Mexico? Would you vote for a candidate who says they are fighting changes in the wind direction? A cleaner planet is fine, but DO NOT suggest, during the current interglacial period, that the next Ice Age will occur because you drive a Tesla. Vanity folks.....
Caption this Meme