Don't get in a big hurry to fire the first shot

It's called history. Ever heard of a far away country called Russia? Ever hear of Cuba? Ever hear of Romania? Ever hear of Hungary.
Do you know when Karl Marx shit out Das Kapital? Do you know when the American Civil War was and why it was fought? (Didn't begin over slavery- it began over states rights- the South put a balanced Budget clause in their short lived constitution. Slavery was always an under current, but became teh issue when it was politically expedient- no charge for the history lesson). Damn those capitalist democrat slave owners!!!(Because that is the truth).

And it probably doesn't show up on that website of propaganda Google anymore, but look up Frederick Douglas, escaped slave, and read his take on the 3/5ths Compromise in the Constitution. I'll wait for your response that the Northern Capitalists didn't call slaves 60% human beings. It was for purposes of the census and preventing the slave owning south from claiming slaves as citizens to maintain legislative power. Remember, population determines the number of Congressional representation. The argument was that slaves can't vote, how then can they be counted as citizens in the census? The anti slave Capitalists of the North intended to legislatively eliminate slavery, and they also sought not to have two nations, one free and one slave on the North American Contintent. Those F#$king Capitalists Evil Founders. Hence the compromise- it was all intended to end slavery, not promote communism, which was still in diapers.

That's what I was about to say, so... may I introduce the uprising of the Irish Volunteers who just wanted freedom (1798), the American Revolution (1776-1783) again for freedom from the British Empire, the Spanish Civil War (1917–1923) against fascists who won, The Meiji Restoration (1868 - 1912) about overthrowing a military dictator and the numerous Roman Civil Wars about who will be the next Emperor.

And these are all communist revolutions how? Marx wrote Das Bullshit in 1867.

Fair enough, The Meiji Restoration (1868 - 1912) and Spanish Civil War (1917–1923) still stand though.

Okay, try reading for comprehension, can I help you out a little?
Communists have used civil wars to conquer many countries. This is a decalrative statement, and concludes in a generalization, saying essentially that communists have used civil wars in MANY countries, not all countries or one country. Does that make sense? I don't have a Dr. Suess dictionary handy. Are you a proud communist? If so learn your evil history. If not, learn teh evil history of communist revolutions. They are responsible for the murder of 150 million people in the 20th century alone. One of my favorite bedtime stories is Mao's Cultural Revolution, where he executed all the intellectuals who supported his revolution. You know, academics, engineers, doctors, the basic people who make societies work.

Ah, okay
Still, the Spanish Civil War.

Ah Okay, many, not all

No, don't flatter yourself. I've seen the destrucction of communitst revolutions. I've been friends with people who fled communist revolutions. You? If you love senseless murder, they are right up your alley.

I wasn’t replying to you.

But fine let’s play your game. Tell me how many civil wars did America back in South America?

The only people gearing up for civil war are hogs and preppers which their ar 15s ain’t gonna do jack against a drone strike.

I’m pacifist by nature but seeing people using sociological framework purism as a basis of causing violence is both ignorant and arrogant of the flow of history which progress has been based off the blood of the innocent or the blood of the guilty.

Don’t believe me ask Jesus.

Oh, so you read the title. "Don't get in a big hurry to fire the first shot"
You claim on another thread to have an affinity for history, if so you know that history is completely driven by violence, it's wars after wars after wars after conquest after conquest. Pacifists never really do very well in all this history.
Don't blaspheme Jesus, the price is pretty high when every knee bows and every tongue confesses that He is Lord. Just to help you out- I used the word EVERY for a reason.
And if yu really know any history,you should know that communists have used civil war to divide and "conquer" many nations. That's just reality.
Now for your Not replying to me comment, I don't see any dialog between you and RavenLink, RAvenLink replies directly to my comments. Seems I;ve struck a nerve.

Last bit…correct and fair enough misread the names while working on a sand blaster.

Correct pacifists do not often fair well for their beliefs. And I stand for my ideals in spite of the consequences and costs. That’s what being principled means.

At what point did I profess myself Jesus. I merely pointed out he gave his blood for the progress of cleansing our sins. I was raised by the new world translation so not label me a blasphemer when I correctly referencing the sacrifice of Jesus.

Well you certainly don't have to worry about being a humble pacifist. That's what arrogant means. Thanks for the pompous use of definitions to demean and degrade your "opponent."
I didn't say you professed Christ, I said you blasphemed (note- I trusted that you could find the definition if you didnt already know it). Like so many others, you mocked Jesus is such a subtle, backhanded way. There are consequences for that. I was merely trying to let you know, maybe you should use the name of allah or buddah next time. Maybe vishi would have a more poetic ring to it, depending on context of course.

I literally point out how Jesus gave his blood for the progress of cleansing humanitys sins. That’s not mocking Jesus. the fact I threw the Bible in your face isn’t mocking Jesus it’s not even mocking you it’s backing up my philosophy by using the entire basis of Christianity which is what the right vastly believes in.

Mocking Jesus would be “Jesus died like a scrub.” Or “Jesus was rascal riding Republican and died on a Walmart scooter because the Roman’s refused to let him see the manager.” Or some crap.

Hell I’m literally a pacifist BECAUSE OF HIM.

Blasphemy: the act or offense of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.
As Aluma said, referencing Jesus' sacrifice correctly is pretty much the opposite of blasphemy.

*The Irish Volunteers were also against the British Empire