Said Robin to Batman

The left are against diversity. Straight white heterosexual males need not apply. Every culture race expanded their territory. Even going back to the "out of Africa" theory, blacks must have migrated to expand territory. So, are blacks the original colonizers? Greeks, Roman, Huns, Persians, they all fought for the land they had. If diversity works, why do muslims stick together, Hindus, blacks etc. These days not even people on different spectrums of the political front can be together. Why is there gay only bars? I have personally been told I don't belong in a gay bar. The reason Islam conquered a load of land was they all had Islam in common. Christianity brought people together. We need things in common to hold us together as a society. If diversity was as common as people like you think, the DNA groups of the globe would reflect this. But, they don't, they show groups stayed together, developed common traits among them and once a group settled in a certain geography, little mixing took place. PC, America wasn't a settled land when whites turned up. Indians were constantly fighting for and over land. Africa was not a settled land either, much of it was unlived on. In modern Africa today, if you cross the invisible border between tribes you are taking your life into your own hands. I would suggest learning some real history and stop playing into the postmodernists hands by believing their race baiting, Marxist, view of history. Progressive, Marxist history is designed to break capitalism, which is also a fake concept.

This doesn't make any sense at all. America was settled by natives, but unfortunately white people killed them all for the heck of it. The reason almost all of history hasn't been diverse is because the idea of being okay with people of all races occupying the same spaces is a relatively new one. Apparently, it's new enough that you don't seem to understand it.

Gonni mac, this is basics mo chara. Do you really believe the "natives" encountered by the white man were native to the land? They were not. They were not the 1st in America. Archaeology tells a very different story to the "story" taught at left wing Marxist colleges & unis. Anthropology also disagrees with the Marxists. When the white man did turn up, Indians were killing Indians. They were always fighting for each other's land. You are stupid if you think America was settled land, same with Africa, it was never settled land back then. And what rubbish mo chara, men travelled and traded all over the world, as far back as King Sol. I have read the diary of an Indian muslim from 900ad who went to Paris, then England. He didn't bother with Scotland as it was a shit hole. He said he put down his prayer mat in London, on the street and no one said boo. He said everyone was friendly, and he reckons he would be able to build a mosque without trouble. You lot, the mad left, don;t have a clue about history. My Family came to England & Scotland 1000 years ago, from France. What no one liked was being raided by foreigners, trades/ sailors, philosophers, explorers have travelled freely for the best part. I turned off my TV in 2004, I suggest everyone does. Oh, my nephew is black & gay, my 2 good muslim friends are from Pakistan & Kashmir, Caroline's dad is from Ghana, and my 2 good black mates in Ireland are Nigerian. I was the only straight guy in the gay bar, etc etc. So, don't hit me with the I don't understand.I've actually left my country and worked abroad. I did 3 years doing History. How the hell can you assume I don't understand? Is it a case of if someone disagrees with yo they are either stupid, misguided, or plain evil? It's sad, all those really good history channels on youtube, run by some very good, honest historians and you still don't have a clue about history, real history, not this Marxist crap they teach now.

So much irony.
Are you claiming to be Left, as you proceed to make a defense against diversity?

Also all you stated was misinformed.

Prove it wrong, your voice isn't supreme. I and all my friends are left wing. We refuse to be called "far right" because we disagree on the far lefts views. I am in my 50s, I remember what left wing was, not this communist Marxist crap. The left used to be working class, until Tony & his uni buddies entered the arena. Everything I said is 100% factual. Unless, I went to uni and didn't even learn how to study. Now, address just one point, prove me wrong, instead of words that mean nothing. Have you studied Anthropology, History, Psychology, Philosophy, Sociology? I am guessing you don't have a clue, personally.

You prove yourself wrong:

▶️ "The left are against diversity."

▶️ "We need things in common to hold us together as a society. If diversity was as common as people like you think, the DNA groups of the globe would reflect this. But, they don't, they show groups stayed together, developed common traits among them and once a group settled in a certain geography, little mixing took place."

▶️ "If diversity works, why do muslims stick together, Hindus, blacks etc. These days not even people on different spectrums of the political front can be together."

🔲 You decry, then advocate the same thing.

▶️ "Even going back to the "out of Africa" theory, blacks must have migrated to expand territory. So, are blacks the original colonizers?"

▶️ "Africa was not a settled land either, much of it was unlived on."

🔲 People have been living in Africa since before humans even evolved, yet in those 8 million years, Africa was not a settled land either, mostly unlived on? So it was empty while people came from it?

Same for the Americas. Who were the European invaders killing millions of if it wasn't settled?

▶️ "The reason Islam conquered a load of land was they all had Islam in common."

Um, what?

▶️ "Christianity brought people together."

Christians have killed more people than all other religions, nations, and any other entity in history COMBINED.

▶️ "Greeks, Roman, Huns, Persians, they all fought for the land they had. If diversity works, why do muslims stick together, Hindus, blacks etc."

🔲 Romans originated in Anatolia or farther east. The Celts, Eutruscans, etc, that lived in the Italic penninsula didn't disappear upon their entrance.

🔲 Huns are a Turkic people that came from Central Asia. They absorbed so much Caucasoid DNA migrating westward that they aren't exactly looked at as Mongols in Europe today, same with Turkey.

🔲 Iranians (Persians) aren't all just Aryans. The 2nd oldest country, the 2nd empire & the 1st superpower in history as well as the only nation Rome couldn't conquer did not supplant the people in the land they invaded - which had extended from the Danube all the way to western China. To this day, 2600 years later, they are still an ethnically and racially mixed society. This is even in the Bible, Cyrus the Great - the first Messiah - liberating the Jews from Babylon and allowing them to return home not sound familiar? To this day there are still Assyrians living in Iran.
Uyghurstan was an Iranian province, they look unmixed to you?