homosexual

This is ridiculous, blatant, and dangerous homophobia

i don't know none homosexual in positions of power

Both Karine Jean-Pierre and Pete Buttigieg are examples of openly LGBT government officials in the US.. maybe they aren't exactly equipped for the job, but that says nothing about homosexuals in general

this two people have the same power and influence than the Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (Winston Churchill)?

i don't think so, they obey

What are you talking about now???

i am talking in english, do you understand me?

Yes I understand the words, but their lack of relevance baffles me. How is the former Prime Minister of the UK relevant?

you talk about two homosexual in the power, i am establishing a comparative between Minister of the UK and two homosexual in the power. The power of this two homosexual doesn't have comparative with the power minister of the UK, they don't have power your power is fantasy.

You brag about this "power" as if it is a good thing? Too much power in the hands of one person is always bad. Your """meme"" should state: "the human being is not designed for positions of power" rather than "the homosexual"

power is power buddy

presidential power is limited limited by the courts limited by the Congress the media's power is unlimited

Allow me to break down what you just said:

1) "Power is power buddy":
Alright, so first off to a bad start we have a false statement. Power is not just power. There are different kinds of power, different levels of power. There is abusive power. Hitler had power.

2) "Presidential power is limited limited by the courts limited by the Congress":
This is a true statement. The presidential power is limited, and that is good.

3) "the media's power is unlimited "
This is an example of a false statement. Obviously the media has power. However, the media's power is not unlimited.

Now allow me to make a statement:
Neither homosexuals nor heterosexuals are fit for a position of power. Humans are evil and greedy and should not be trusted with too much power.

You are atheist or anarchist, it's not for nothing you is against of the power and authority

In the United States, between 6% and 15% of citizens demonstrated nonreligious attitudes and naturalistic worldviews, namely atheists or agnostics.

You are minority

You cannot baselessly accuse me of being atheist or anarchist. I'm neither.
Whether or not I am an atheist does not matter.
Were I an atheist, this argument would have been exactly the same.
Your statements are irrelevant and nonsensical.
Also, the statistics you mentioned are completely incorrect.
In fact, approximately 30% of Americans are religiously unaffiliated/atheist.

You said, "it's not for nothing you is against of the power and authority".
What are you talking about?

You're talking in English? Not very well