It's censored + it's marked NSFW

ever read tos?

It's censored DUMBASS so it's not breaking the TOS.

"The Imgflip generators can be used for anything that does not violate these terms, but please set any pornographic images you create as "private", and then post them elsewhere if you wish to share. Any pornographic images that are not created with the "private" setting are subject to removal. This includes images that are pornographic in nature even if private parts are censored"

checkmate

you do not understand the meaning of pornographic

no checkmate nga ur dumb and lack basic reading comprehension

por·no·graph·ic
/ˌpôrnəˈɡrafik/
adjective
constituting or resembling pornography; obscene.
"pornographic images"

so that gif isnt "pornographic in nature"? it clearly is a naked person running on the beach. id say that its clearly pornographic or related

resembling pornography? nothing sexual is in the video so idk what you mean

did you miss the naked guy running?

why is that sexual

i said

"so that gif isnt "pornographic in nature"? it clearly is a naked person running on the beach. id say that its clearly pornographic or related"

not

"so that gif isnt "pornographic in nature"? it clearly is a naked person running on the beach. id say that its clearly pornographic"

when you accuse someone of saying something, you have to make sure they dont have proof of what they actually said. you also should use the full context, especially on text.

saying "or related" literally means the same as "in nature"

stop coping lil nga you lost 💀

bro when did i admit i was wrong? this whole argument has been you accusing me of saying something without using context. your ignoring the context because your trying to get me mad.

no im not bro

also not the "whole argument" i accused you of saying it (which you did) and then you denied it

thats why i said "pornographic in nature", i made reference that it wasnt porn, but public nudity.

so you admit you're wrong ?

alright bro thanks for telling me you're stupid

prove im wrong, and dont use a incomplete accusation.

porn does not constitute all instances of nudity.

there u go bro ur wrong pls stop coping now

man this coulda been civil, to bad you argue like a child

too bad you're wrong 💀

what i said and what you said are the complete opposite, no need to bunch what we say into one bundle

alright bro i get it you cant take that ur wrong its okay

i said i denied saying what your saying i said in the context you presented

i said i said what you said i said

me when im losing the argument

in nature and are related are the sme yeah, but that only proves my point.

i used those to say that the tos breaker was related to pornography in the sense that it contained nudity(blurred or not).
all your doing is putting more words in my mouth

i said something along with something else, you just say i said something without giving the full message. if you use your eyes you could clearly see that i said more than what your quoting me for.

but you still said it and then denied it??

it doesnt have anything to do with what you said after

you missed the 2 words after that lil bro, you cant twist what i say when the proof is right above you

except that's literally what you said and then you tried to deny it lol

"you did indeed say it was porn"

well, saying "pornographic or related" or "pornographic in nature" isnt saying "thats porn right their" is it?

"id say that its clearly pornographic"

well, considering you said it

shit i forgot the quotation marks

explanation given

all good

seeing a naked dude on the street high on crack isn't porn

aint no way your this dumb

you're the one telling people flag a 3 second video of a dude running on a beach saying its porn

just cause naked people are involved doesnt mean its porn lol

i said it broke tos, not that it was porn.

you did indeed say it was porn

"id say that its clearly pornographic"

just cause naked people are involved doesnt mean its porn lol

please explain

???

so you agree with me

sounds like you're just horny lil bro

very mature

Not really

yeah

It's censored.
Imgflip says that all private parts MUST be covered. It's also marked NSFW. The private parts (In this case the boobs and female version of a carrot) are blurred.

"The Imgflip generators can be used for anything that does not violate these terms, but please set any pornographic images you create as "private", and then post them elsewhere if you wish to share. Any pornographic images that are not created with the "private" setting are subject to removal. This includes images that are pornographic in nature even if private parts are censored"

it is pornographic in nature, even if its marked nsfw and parts are blurred its still isnt marked private.

|:()