Destroy free speech?

Says right wingers who want the government to pass laws that restirct it for those they don't like such as gay people and they are even banning books. So who is against "free speech" You feelings are not constitutional.

Control media? Says the right wingers who want private businesses to be forced to spew their bs.

go to your boss and tell him your going to put up Trump posters at your job. See how that goes if you work for a company with many emplowees that is

Racial division? Says right wingers who gush over a skank adulterer who attacks jews

One Party rule? Says the right wingers who cry about two party rule 24/7

Destroy Relgion? Says the right wingers who lie to themselves about religion and claim America is a "christian" nation when it never has been. Just another lie so you can rationalize your hate and persection of muslims.

Let rational people know when they actually outlaw "christianity" then you will have a valid grudge

End The Second Amendment? Says right wingers who support and defend the gun laws they "like" and have no issues with cops that violate gun rights daily in America

Lawfare??? Wtf is that

Arrest Political Enemies? Says right wingers who support a orange man child demanding people be arrested without due process because he's pissed off he has so many legal issues.

Instead of facing facts "right wingers" ignore the evidence of his possible crimes and actually believe accusations about Democrats prove Trump is innocent LOLOLOL

The rest of that very lame meme cracks me up BTW? Trump Votes by mail.

I know I know you will rationalize that 2

Fifth Circuit Corrects Critical Error In Prior Ruling To Shut Down Deep-State Censorship Tactic

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals expanded the size and scope of its injunction against the government’s central censorship arm.The district court therefore disarmed the speech police by ordering a wide-ranging preliminary injunction, prohibiting federal authorities from coercing and coordinating with platforms to suppress ever-growing categories of disfavored speech during the pendency of the case.

This incensed the feds, who proceeded to appeal the decision to the Fifth Circuit, ironically arguing that by being barred from censoring disfavored speech by social media proxy, the government itself was being censored.

The Fifth Circuit wasn’t buying that argument.