Fauci's Ouchie

You mean like this?

Now Stan, you know he was not convicted. He was found not guilty. It was the lawsuit he lost. There is a difference, Stan and you know that. Don't be afraid to show you smarts.

Online reactions are pouring in from conservatives following a Manhattan jury convicting former President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting E. Jean Carroll as part of a battery and defamation lawsuit filed by the former Elle columnist.

The nine-person jury made the decision in less than three hours, reaching a mixed verdict that did not include a rape conviction. Carroll was also awarded $5 million in total damages for her claims against Trump, with $2 million in compensatory damages for the battery claim.

In CULT45 world, this is not guilty? You will love his other convictions!!

"While E. Jean Carroll's lawsuit was a civil trial, the fact that the jury was asked to consider the evidence as to whether Trump raped, sexually abused or forcibly touched her might have led some to believe the matter was criminal or otherwise intimated criminal guilt.

The word "liability" is also key. As Notre Dame Law School professor Jay Tidmarsh, an expert in complex civil litigation and civil procedure, told Newsweek, "civil cases do not speak of 'guilt' or 'innocence'" but instead "use the language 'liable' or 'not liable,'" as reporting of the jury's verdict repeated."

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935

Cost him $5 million and legal fees, not a bad day for the grifter.

Found him liable. That's how it goes.