Ok, step by step here. You ready? 1. "Someone is claiming that in the USA, guns have more rights than transgender people. That's actually true." 2. "Someone else responds by stating that they can't legally cut the barrel of their shotgun. 3. What isn't stated is that a transgender woman can legally have her p**is cut off. That's irrelevant nevertheless,", [({ the response-- nevertheless since the chromosomes in the p&%nisless man reamain XY her is still biologically a man with a severed thingee})] 4.Here's where the theme of the responding meme takes it's frame of reference---pay very close attention---= "since a sawn off shotgun is dangerous, whereas a transgender woman with her p**is removed is actually less of a danger to women than a pre-op transgender woman."
This is when mental gymnastics necessary for a sense of humor kicks in. Bubba and Chad are in the prison shower, Chad drops the soap. So is Bubba a safe transgender p$$nisless man? Or is he an OG with a sawed off shotgun?
Here's where logic and having to explain humor cascade into a pile of non-existential blather. Relying on the premise that a sawed off pOOOOnish is safer than a sawed off shotgun, therefore would it be safer for Chad if Bubba the panicsishless transsexual man brought a dangerous sawed off shotgun into the shower and accosted the bent over Chad or if he left the sawed off shotgun in his cell and simply accosted Chad with his sawed off panish area?.
There is of course, as with much humor some implied inuendo, but I'm tired of substitution #$%^&*(!@#$ for letters to make my point. Ask your mom to explain it.
BTW- in the USA inanimate objects such as guns have no rights. In the USA citizens have the right to keep and bear arms for this reason (See attached non-humorous meme)