Word of the Day

Yet Larry and the My Little Pony guy are probably still not convinced.

😂

We good....😂😆😜😁

Two things are more overwhelming than the evidence... The DOJ/FBI ignoring it... and the leftist cult turning a blind eye to it...

See, you say that, but which court has been overwhelmed by the evidence so far?

So, people who aren't trained nor experienced at analysing evidence?

OK. But the ones with the skills, credentials, qualifications, and expertise in literally judging your evidence work in a place called a court.

Lolololol. There are plenty of folks in the public that possess the capacity to EVALUATE evidence that aren't employed at the court. Besides, you missed the point.

No, YOU'VE missed the point. These things are decided in court. Until then, no matter how many people believe it, all you've proven is that that's how many people might be wrong.

Go back and read my response to which court has been overwhelmed with evidence. Your choice to ignore the initial point and then change the subject is laughable. And pathetic.

Yeah, you overwhelmed gullible people on the Internet. Good job. The courts very much remain underwhelmed, and THEY'RE THE FINAL SAY.

Bye Felicia! Cry yourself to sleep. Maybe you should flag me. Lololololol!

Are you still here? Do you need help switching off your computer? It's the button that has like an up-down line inside a circle.

This is fun!
Let's recap.
You: which court has been overwhelmed?
Me: the court of public opinion
You: only people who work in courts can "judge" evidence
Me: people who don't work in courts are quite capable of EVALUATING (because judging in a judicial sense is so stupid) evidence.
You: courts decide "these things" (so we've moved away from the whole evidence theme) and I've proven people (who presumably is the public) are wrong.

Listen kiddo, you didn't like the response I gave you and you decided to say that the public needs to be trained to evaluate what they have been shown (evidence) so they can have the experience necessary to form the correct (perhaps truthful) opinion.
You are clearly wrong in that supposition.
In fact, I'd posit that a substantial percentage of the public, far exceeding the number of people who work in "the court", possess the demonstrable ability to evaluate presented information.
Both in tangible quantity and quality.
Just because a vocal percentage have concluded, based upon the information available to them regarding the current topic, something you didn't conclude, doesn't change the fact that a) the public has formed an opinion and, b) the public possesses the capacity to form its opinion in a manner that most certainly doesn't require specific training.
Further, I'm in full agreement that courts will decide. I also agree that agents of the state and private litigators have appropriate and adequate training to do their respective jobs.
You, narrowed a clear (and humorous, unless you don't have a sense of one of course) answer to your obvious trolling, down to your real motive for fishing on this meme.
You're just wrong in the stupid direction you took it.
Maybe this will go into the judicial system, maybe it won't. I don't care either way. The outcome is irrelevant to me and this little diversion.
You: people who vocally support something I don't are wrong and stupid.
Me: look in the mirror hypocrite.
Good night sweetie, I believe you have familiarity with how to turn your computer off.

OK Felicia. Bye bye!

Sure. You can turn off your device whenever you want. That was always an option.