"Let's recap.
* Bill Clinton kept audio tapes that contained national security information in his sock drawer. In 2012 an Obama-appointed Judge out of the DC circuit ruled that he had the right to have them.
* Barack Obama kept classified documents in an abandoned warehouse.
* Hillary Clinton kept classified documents on a private server
* Mike Pence admitted to having classified material
None of these people were indicted. The fact that Trump was, violates his 1st amendment rights. You can't indict someone via selective prosecution with the goal of suppressing his right to free speech, right to assemble, or right to associate, aka run for office. If a President having possession and personal custody of information related to national security is a crime, which this indictment alleges, then every President would need to be indicted. Fact that only Trump has been indicted for doing the same thing others have done, the DOJ is using selective prosecution to target him, which violates his 1st amendment rights.
The DOJ violated Trump's 4th amendment right when they pierced his right to attorney-client privilege by using a corrupt D.C. Judge to force Trump's lawyers to testify against him.
Lastly, there should never have been a Grand Jury appointed in D.C. being that the case will be heard in FL. You can't go fishing for which Grand Jury may indict someone. But the DOJ didn't want the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of FL to have access to the case. They didn't want the Grand Jury in FL to go awol and have control of the case. Most importantly, they didn't want Judge Cannon in FL to preside over the breach of attorney-client privilege concerning the D.C. Grand Jury subpoenas in the case.
They misused and abused a Grand Jury (D.C.) that did not have venue over the case in order to manipulate judicial selection, which is a violation of the Grand Jury clause, violation of the Venue Clause, and a violation of the 5th & 6th Amendment rights to due process."
