He took an oath to uphold all laws, even when he didn't want to.

Robert Kennedy Jr. on Durham Report: “That Report Is Appalling – You Have 50 Top Level CIA Agents Who Agree to Collaborate in a Project to Fix Election”

Mr. Anti-VAX is MAGA's hand chosen candidate to primary Biden. Is it any wonder that you are promoting him? I wouldn't support him for any office. Connections to right-wingers are a family tradition. RFK, Senior (his Dad) worked with Joe McCarthy (the namesake of McCarthyism). Roy Cohn was RFK's boss and mentor. After Joe McCarthy faded into obscurity, Roy Cohn became Donald Trump's lawyer, defending him against charges of Racist rental policies. RFK, Jr. was destined to become a MAGA shill.

LOL... you're just mad his dad went after Jimmy Hoffa...

In my family's Republican household, Hoffa was (not incorrectly) seen as a criminal.

Now do Ray Epps, the fed.

I am done defending Mr. Epps, who is a conservative, small businessman from Arizona. If you have something you would like to say, I suggest that you two meet and sort things out, Man to Man.

So you have no problem with one of the loudest protesters, encouraging breaking into the Capitol building, not even getting arrested while people that took a guided tour are in solitary? Wow, you really serve the agenda, don't you? FBI, I assume?

Yes... that oath included not supporting fraudulent elections like the 2020 election...

"I [name] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

The oath is neither "Conservative or Liberal." If he felt a political calling that would not let him to "faithfully discharge the duties of the office," he should have not taken the oath. According to Arthur P. Meister, retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent and Instructor at FBI's Training Center at Quantico, VA:

"Officers should not take a solemn oath until they examine its true and implicit meanings to fully understand and completely accept what they ardently are committing themselves to do. They need to have a strong conviction to endure long after the emotion of the moment has faded and years of adversity have pummeled its ardor."

It is not easy to put aside one's personal feelings and upholding the law. In that over 60 courts have ruled that the 2020 election of Joe Biden is legal, thousands of conservative FBI agents have stayed loyal to the law, as they swore to do. Allowing a few rogue officers' illegal behavior reflect poorly on the vast majority could undermine their esprit d' corps, and readiness for duty.

No courts heard any evidence. Corrupt Democrat operatives didn't even hear them. Not surprising seeing the results of the Durham Report that exposed the crooked Democrat flunkies that carried Barry the Kenyan's water.

All 64-judges reviewed the evidence presented with the filings. About half of those ruled that the cases had no merit. The other half had hearings to review the cases and present further evidence. Those cases were also found to have no merit. That's what judges do. They review whatever evidence is presented. Many of these judges were Trump appointees.

In fact, the Constitution says no such thing. And, it doesn't say you can't be fired for insubordination by the FBI. The applicable law is found in Chapter 18, Paragraph 2385 of the United States Code. Among other things, it says: "Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined (up to $20,000) under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction."

It sounds to me like the FBI is following the applicable law. What you are advocating comes from the Declaration of Independence. It is not a law or part of the Constitution. Following your interpretation of what it says may make you a Revolutionary and admired by some. But it does not offer the protections offered by obeying the actual Constitution.

So sorry Larry... the Durham report is just another proof in a long line of evidence that the 2020 election was stolen... It's called proof of election interference...

The Durham report concerned the 2016 election. It proved nothing about it, other than an FBI lawyer lied in order to get a FISA Wiretap. There is absolutely nothing in the report about election interference in 2020. That is an absurd reach. But what should I expect from someone who doesn't know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

Yes Larry... I wouldn't expect you to understand the connection...