Real constitutionalists would never whine about someone being held to account for their actions.

One of the cult's favorite "defensive" talking/scare points of late is "If they can do this to Trump, imagine what they can do to you." regarding prosecution of the Moron Church's Patriarch. Personally, I find it odd that a flock of sheep which bleats so loudly about constitutionality is apparently unaware the priniciple of none being beyond the reach of the law is enshrined in Amend. 14 Sec. 1... but I digress. Consider the case of Coking v. CRDA, Donald Trump and Trump Plaza resultant from one Donald J. Trump attempting to force a widow out of her home by pulling strings at City Hall and having it condemned with the ultimate but failed objective of razing it to ground to build a limousine parking lot; this is not something a person with morals or honor would do. Which brings us to the question the cult should be asking itself instead of whining about Garrilus Stultus being denied an unconstitutional position of impunity: "If private citizen Donald J. Trump is willing to abuse a local government to take a widow's home from her for personal gain, what will he do as God-king with the power of the entire federal government at his disposal?"