Because there should be NO galaxies that far "back in time" according to the theory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ALNWSbehAo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2JLbQBhOJE&t=40s
[deleted] M
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
im extremely confused, the first one is literally just the second one with a yellow tint, what changed? I mean, we knew the Big Bang didn't happen in the first place, why...? Honestly, I don't know what question I'm trying to ask. lol.
Sorry for the confusion. The pictures are just samples of Hubble (80's telescope) vs Webb (new telescope). Webb images are much more detailed and stunning astronomers. It can see much farther away and they were expecting to find smaller and smaller galaxies, and then just darkness before the "big bang". Hubble seemed to support that due to low resolution. Webb shows fully formed galaxies all the way back to the beginning. (As if all the galaxies were made at once and the universe was "spread out like a curtain" as it says in Isaiah.) Scientists looking at fuzzy Hubble images were guided by the personal bias, now they can see clearly that galaxies began all at once. Now they need to come up with an new idea, anything but... In the beginning God Created.
[deleted] M
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
L to them, they probably need to stop chasing human ideas and embrace the OBVIOUS evidence of the Word.
HOW COULD TWO TELESCOPES REACH SUCH OPPOSITE CONCLUSIONS? WEBB TELESCOPE; HUBBLE TELESCOPE; BIG BANG TRUE! BIG BANG FALSE! BECAUSE HUBBLE IMAGES WERE FUZZY ENOUGH TO LEAVE ROOM FOR INTERPRETATION... AND SCIENTISTS "BELIEVED" IN THE BIG BANG.
